You have probably seen the stories about the creepy, mandatory reeducation program for University of Delaware students. If you have missed the story, or want more, the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education is all over it -- here is a roundup.
However, if you don't have time to go through it all, here is a couple of examples I took right from their curricula. Note that the following goals for the program are set in the context of, as the university puts it, "treatment" for students incorrect beliefs and worldviews. This is from the Central Complex residence hall:
Look at 2B and C for example! Its coincident timing, but look at stuff above in the context of this post, which I wrote before I even saw this. Could there be a more resounding confirmation of this:
I have to lay a lot of this failure on universities like my own.
Having made students jump through unbelievable hoops just to get
admitted, and then having charged them $60,000 a year for tuition,
universities feel like they need to make students feel better about
this investment. Universities have convinced their graduates that
public pursuits are morally superior to grubby old corporate jobs (that
actually require, you know, real work), and then have further convinced
them that they are ready to change to world and be leaders at 22. Each
and every one of them graduate convinced they have something important
to say and that the world is kneeling at their feet to hear it. But
who the f*ck cares what a 22-year-old with an Ivy League politics
degree has to say? Who in heavens name listened to Lincoln or
Churchill in their early twenties? It's a false expectation. The Ivy
League is training young people for, and in fact encouraging them to
pursue, a job (ie 22-year-old to whom we all happily defer to tell us
what to do) that simply does not exist. A few NGO's and similar
organizations offer a few positions that pretend to be this
job, but these are more in the nature of charitable make-work positions
to help Harvard Kennedy School graduates with their self-esteem, kind
of like basket-weaving for mental patients.
If you read through the whole document, which is nearly impossible because it is a classic example of academic mental masturbation, you will see the curriculum is dominated by this sustainability notion
Somehow none of the residence halls chose "the role of capitalism and individual entrepreneurship in creating wealth." Remember that these are all areas that the university has declared that students require "treatment" if their views do not conform with the university orthodoxy. They are expecting that all students must share all of these beliefs. For real creepiness, read about the student that the RA conducting this curriculum actually felt the need to report to university officials because her attitudes were so "out of whack". She was reported for saying obviously horrendous things like this answer:
1) When were you first made aware of your race?
"That is irrelevant to everything. My race is human being."
Fortunately, the University of Delaware killed the program after a firestorm of national outrage. If you have read the FIRE blog long enough, you will suspect that Delaware will find some way in the future to sneak it back in.
My post of the vacuousness of student activists, written before I even saw this, is here.
Update: How did I miss this great quote, from the university's Office of Residence Life Diversity Education Training documents:
"A RACIST: A racist is one who is both privileged and socialized on the
basis of race by a white supremacist (racist) system. "˜The term applies
to all white people (i.e., people of European descent) living in the
United States, regardless of class, gender, religion, culture or
sexuality. By this definition, people of color cannot be racists,
because as peoples within the system, they do not have the power to
back up their prejudices, hostilities, or acts of discrimination"¦.'"