Kevin Drum has a post discussing vote counts on Syrian war in the House, and observing that support is coming from Democrats and opposition from Republicans. Hilariously, Drum comes to the conclusion that the Republicans are the big hypocrites here and are much worse than Democrats. I think most of us who are not members of the red or blue team see this conclusion for what it is -- a horribly blinkered partisan view. Republicans who a decade ago were implying it was close to treason not to blindly support our President in a time of war are clearly hypocrites, but no more so than Democrats who filled the streets with people chanting about the fierce moral urgency to avoid war, with the robust and high-profile anti-war movement virtually disappearing once their guy was leading the wars.
But for those (mainly Democrats of late) who have criticized partisanship and gridlock and lack of bipartisan solutions, we are seeing the one and only advantage of partisanship: That there are people in Congress who will always have an incentive to oppose anything that comes along, if only for narrow partisan tactical reasons. Nothing is so good of an idea that it does not deserve challenge and push-back before we implement it (likely forever, since we never repeal anything and wars and their consequences take forever to go away).
The US Congress is like those hoarders you see on reality TV shows. They have built up a 200+ year accumulation of laws and wars and regulations and other crap, until the very walls strain to hold it all. And still they are out every day trying to add more. They need an intervention every time they try to add another item to the hoard -- "Are you sure you really need that?" Providing that intervention, whether out of good intentions or bad, is the one and only aspect of American team politics I can get behind.