Coyote Blog

I pledge my allegiance to America, and the notions for which it stands.

My demonstration of this will occur 11/6/12, when I vote that fascist SOB out of office.

If Obama hadn't, would you have criticized him like this? "In 1959 Eisenhower proclaimed May 1 the first official observance of Loyalty Day, and each US President has followed in his footsteps, until Obama broke with this tradition and instead followed the lead of multicultural relativists, rejecting loyalty and patriotism and instead ..."

Yes, it's all Obama's fault! (Too good to check, I guess.)

I celebrate May 1st as the day I met the woman whom I would eventually be fortunate enough to marry, and yes, I'm quite loyal.

I am proud of the people of America, the land of America, the memes of America, and the history of America.

It's too bad that there's a huge socialist government that uses the same name, though.

That's one thing that does NOT get my loyalty.

In three short years, Glorious Leader has turned the USA into the USSA. Nothing short of civil war will return this republic to its original state.

>>>> The current clown is no better or worse than the others

You are such an utter fool that it boggles the mind.

There's a term, wronger than wrong:

"When people thought the earth was flat, they were wrong. When people thought the earth was spherical, they were wrong. But if you think that thinking the earth is spherical is just as wrong as thinking the earth is flat, then your view is wronger than both of them put together."

By this criteria, is Obama bad? Yep. Is Romney bad? Yep.

Is Romney*§* just as bad as President Downgrade?

Is your head stuck so far up your rectum that it's coming back out the top?

The answers to the two ARE the same.

=================

*§* Actually, you can insert most any vaguely serious GOP candidate, and probably about 75% of Americans into this statement in Romney's place. Even some random lottery winner would flounder about uselessly and be less destructive than a first term Obama has been. I don't even want to THINK about the dangers of second-term Obama.

Seriously. If this country fails to reject a second-term for Obama, this nation is doomed. It very well might or might not be doomed even if they reject him, but they are certainly doomed if they don't.

Hey, we're lucky he didn't name it "Obedience Day"

>>> In three short years, Glorious Leader has turned the USA into the USSA.

No, it's been steadily happening since the first civil war.

From the wiki, you will find that Grover Cleveland was our last truly great PotUS:

=========================================================
In 1887, Cleveland issued his most well-known veto, that of the Texas Seed Bill. After a drought had ruined crops in several Texas counties, Congress appropriated $10,000 to purchase seed grain for farmers there. Cleveland vetoed the expenditure. In his veto message, he espoused a theory of limited government:

I can find no warrant for such an appropriation in the Constitution, and I do not believe that the power and duty of the general government ought to be extended to the relief of individual suffering which is in no manner properly related to the public service or benefit. A prevalent tendency to disregard the limited mission of this power and duty should, I think, be steadfastly resisted, to the end that the lesson should be constantly enforced that, though the people support the government, the government should not support the people. The friendliness and charity of our countrymen can always be relied upon to relieve their fellow-citizens in misfortune. This has been repeatedly and quite lately demonstrated. Federal aid in such cases encourages the expectation of paternal care on the part of the government and weakens the sturdiness of our national character, while it prevents the indulgence among our people of that kindly sentiment and conduct which strengthens the bonds of a common brotherhood.

Think about it. He's the last PotUS who really, clearly grasped the above. Even Teddy didn't Get It: a lot of our problematic Federal Agency issues we have today derive from agencies he started or encouraged to start by making the Federal government into a Great And Powerful Government. Taft followed suit with the various acts that changed the way Senators got elected and enable the Income Tax. Wilson furthered the transition by ramping up the size of government massively. Prohibition took it a step farther by making something that had no business being done into a Federal issue, then engendered a crime wave that, along with the Depression, led to the first controls on firearms and the notions of socialism becoming worthy of consideration.

Q.E.D., it's been a slow and steady process of turning the USA into the USSA. The Great Big 0 has certainly done his absolute best to further the process, and done quite well at that, but it's hardly been a solo gig of the last couple years.

Bupkis. Yiddish eh? I rest my case.

More interesting is his new campaign slogan, "FORWARD."

http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/inside-politics/2012/apr/30/new-obama-slogan-has-long-ties-marxism-socialism/.

Wikipedia's short stub pointing out the word's use in socialist ideals and publications is currently up for deletion. Interesting to watch a record get edited in real time.

FWIW - my take on that is that (a) protest votes through write-in candidates are good because they have a beneficial signalling effect on future elections and (b) if I have to choose between two horrible evils (like the front-runners in this election), I'd always choose the contender (because he's more of an unknown and to punish the incumbent - again, signaling in the hope of impacting future behavior)

Markm, i think calling Romney a "liberal fascist" is a bit much. I am sure he is less a supporter of the whole Tea Party concept than I'd like him to be, but the notion that he will be even a vague fraction as bad for the country as The Great Big 0 is a preposterous notion by any rational measure.

me: being clueless, you fail to grasp that a failure to vote AGAINST the one in office is almost always a bad idea when your vote has a substantial chance to COUNT.

The time to make protest votes is when your vote isn't going to sway things either way. Not in close races. To make protest votes in close races is the most dunderheaded exercise of franchise short of actually voting for the incumbent PoS.