<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Marginal Vote Will Be Even More Expensive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/11/the-marginal-vote-will-be-even-more-expensive.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/11/the-marginal-vote-will-be-even-more-expensive.html</link>
	<description>Dispatches from a Small Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:55:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/11/the-marginal-vote-will-be-even-more-expensive.html/comment-page-1#comment-29770</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=9771#comment-29770</guid>
		<description>Plus, if they had just put &quot;Louisiana&quot; in the bill, the Treasury could just cut a check to Louisiana.

They way they actually did it, someone at Medicaid has to write an application which will be used to apply for the new subsidy (and a team of lawyers will review it).  

Next, a team in Louisiana will have to fill out said application to certify their eligibility for the new funds, including gathering the appropriate evidence (and a team of lawyers will review it).

Then, the appropriate office in the federal government will review the submitted application to confirm that Louisiana does indeed meet the criteria that were carefully drafted to apply only to Louisiana (and a team of lawyers will review that decision).

Also, there are probably lobbyists and &quot;consultants&quot; involved at each step of the process.

What terms will you offer me on a wager that this process will add at least $0.5M in process costs to the distribution of the $100M in funds?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plus, if they had just put &#8220;Louisiana&#8221; in the bill, the Treasury could just cut a check to Louisiana.</p>
<p>They way they actually did it, someone at Medicaid has to write an application which will be used to apply for the new subsidy (and a team of lawyers will review it).  </p>
<p>Next, a team in Louisiana will have to fill out said application to certify their eligibility for the new funds, including gathering the appropriate evidence (and a team of lawyers will review it).</p>
<p>Then, the appropriate office in the federal government will review the submitted application to confirm that Louisiana does indeed meet the criteria that were carefully drafted to apply only to Louisiana (and a team of lawyers will review that decision).</p>
<p>Also, there are probably lobbyists and &#8220;consultants&#8221; involved at each step of the process.</p>
<p>What terms will you offer me on a wager that this process will add at least $0.5M in process costs to the distribution of the $100M in funds?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: palm beach sugar daddy ken doll</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/11/the-marginal-vote-will-be-even-more-expensive.html/comment-page-1#comment-29586</link>
		<dc:creator>palm beach sugar daddy ken doll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=9771#comment-29586</guid>
		<description>how&#039;s the old joke go? 

unnamed, non-specific, scumbucket female senator from a state like, say, louisiana: &quot;what do you think i am !? some kind of **whore**?!?&quot;

unnamed, nonspecific, ambulatory &amp; sentient fecal male senator from a state like, say, nevada: &quot;we&#039;ve already established that, mary - uh...&quot;madam&quot;. what we&#039;re doing now is settling on a price&quot;. 

it&#039;s like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how&#8217;s the old joke go? </p>
<p>unnamed, non-specific, scumbucket female senator from a state like, say, louisiana: &#8220;what do you think i am !? some kind of **whore**?!?&#8221;</p>
<p>unnamed, nonspecific, ambulatory &amp; sentient fecal male senator from a state like, say, nevada: &#8220;we&#8217;ve already established that, mary &#8211; uh&#8230;&#8221;madam&#8221;. what we&#8217;re doing now is settling on a price&#8221;. </p>
<p>it&#8217;s like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judge Fredd</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/11/the-marginal-vote-will-be-even-more-expensive.html/comment-page-1#comment-29486</link>
		<dc:creator>Judge Fredd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=9771#comment-29486</guid>
		<description>I contacted her, as she&#039;s my senator, but I told her that I knew that my concern was immaterial and that she was going to vote the way that her party told her.  Still told her to vote &quot;no&quot;.

$100 million?  Wow, what a pat on the head for getting on ones knees in supplication.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I contacted her, as she&#8217;s my senator, but I told her that I knew that my concern was immaterial and that she was going to vote the way that her party told her.  Still told her to vote &#8220;no&#8221;.</p>
<p>$100 million?  Wow, what a pat on the head for getting on ones knees in supplication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/11/the-marginal-vote-will-be-even-more-expensive.html/comment-page-1#comment-29360</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=9771#comment-29360</guid>
		<description>OK, this comment is: a)obvious; b)expected. But somebody has to make it.

Only $100M? That&#039;s all? Mary caved for a mere $100M?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, this comment is: a)obvious; b)expected. But somebody has to make it.</p>
<p>Only $100M? That&#8217;s all? Mary caved for a mere $100M?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
