<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cost of Climate Change Legislation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/10/cost-of-climate-change-legislation.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/10/cost-of-climate-change-legislation.html</link>
	<description>Dispatches from a Small Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:04:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daublin</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/10/cost-of-climate-change-legislation.html/comment-page-1#comment-24800</link>
		<dc:creator>Daublin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=9446#comment-24800</guid>
		<description>FWIW, the cost/benefit argument is more compelling to me than the science argument.  Even taking the IPCC&#039;s overblown conclusions as true, the policy implications are mostly to do nothing right now, anyway.

In short, given a choice between the dark ages and a warmer planet, I believe almost anyone will pick a warmer planet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW, the cost/benefit argument is more compelling to me than the science argument.  Even taking the IPCC&#8217;s overblown conclusions as true, the policy implications are mostly to do nothing right now, anyway.</p>
<p>In short, given a choice between the dark ages and a warmer planet, I believe almost anyone will pick a warmer planet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

