<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Observer Effect and Using Google for Social Science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/09/the-observer-effect-and-using-google-for-social-science.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/09/the-observer-effect-and-using-google-for-social-science.html</link>
	<description>Dispatches from a Small Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:55:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Linda Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/09/the-observer-effect-and-using-google-for-social-science.html/comment-page-1#comment-23739</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=9142#comment-23739</guid>
		<description>Nevermind.  Now I&#039;m getting 283,000 hits for &quot;number may be lower.&quot; I accessed Google from another page. 

Faith restored.  Sort of.  Hmmmmm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nevermind.  Now I&#8217;m getting 283,000 hits for &#8220;number may be lower.&#8221; I accessed Google from another page. </p>
<p>Faith restored.  Sort of.  Hmmmmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/09/the-observer-effect-and-using-google-for-social-science.html/comment-page-1#comment-23738</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=9142#comment-23738</guid>
		<description>For me, just now, &quot;true number may be lower&quot; got 5180 hits.  However, &quot;actual number may be lower&quot; got 127,000 hits.

But get this.  Stripping the modifier and entering only &quot;number may be lower&quot; snagged a mere 745 hits.

How the heck could that be?  Seriously, wouldn&#039;t it have to appear at least 127,000 times, just for the &quot;actual&quot; phrase above?  Plus 5180 more times for the &quot;true&quot; version?

My faith is being shaken here.  Something more pernicious than the Observer Effect is afoot.

Still, shaken certainties aside, great post, as usual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me, just now, &#8220;true number may be lower&#8221; got 5180 hits.  However, &#8220;actual number may be lower&#8221; got 127,000 hits.</p>
<p>But get this.  Stripping the modifier and entering only &#8220;number may be lower&#8221; snagged a mere 745 hits.</p>
<p>How the heck could that be?  Seriously, wouldn&#8217;t it have to appear at least 127,000 times, just for the &#8220;actual&#8221; phrase above?  Plus 5180 more times for the &#8220;true&#8221; version?</p>
<p>My faith is being shaken here.  Something more pernicious than the Observer Effect is afoot.</p>
<p>Still, shaken certainties aside, great post, as usual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/09/the-observer-effect-and-using-google-for-social-science.html/comment-page-1#comment-23724</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=9142#comment-23724</guid>
		<description>I think you have more accurately described Heisenberg&#039;s discovery than does the view which asserts the universe is uncertain. Put another way: the Uncertainty Principle says that there is a finite limit to the precision of a measurement because the measuring disturbs that which is measured rather than says that that which is measured is governed by chance. Put a still another, perhaps more final way: there exist limits to what people can know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you have more accurately described Heisenberg&#8217;s discovery than does the view which asserts the universe is uncertain. Put another way: the Uncertainty Principle says that there is a finite limit to the precision of a measurement because the measuring disturbs that which is measured rather than says that that which is measured is governed by chance. Put a still another, perhaps more final way: there exist limits to what people can know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: delurking</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/09/the-observer-effect-and-using-google-for-social-science.html/comment-page-1#comment-23723</link>
		<dc:creator>delurking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=9142#comment-23723</guid>
		<description>This is funny.  I put in &quot;the true number may be smaller&quot; and got 2 hits.  One said that about a spending growth estimate.  The other was a physics paper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is funny.  I put in &#8220;the true number may be smaller&#8221; and got 2 hits.  One said that about a spending growth estimate.  The other was a physics paper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
