<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blaming the Free Market for Government Actions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/09/blaming-the-free-market-for-government-actions.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/09/blaming-the-free-market-for-government-actions.html</link>
	<description>Dispatches from a Small Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Software</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/09/blaming-the-free-market-for-government-actions.html/comment-page-1#comment-23603</link>
		<dc:creator>Software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=8998#comment-23603</guid>
		<description>Thank you for another great post.
I look forward to many more entries with high quality info.



&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rain-clouds.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;craigslist software&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for another great post.<br />
I look forward to many more entries with high quality info.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rain-clouds.com" rel="nofollow">craigslist software</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UNRR</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/09/blaming-the-free-market-for-government-actions.html/comment-page-1#comment-23152</link>
		<dc:creator>UNRR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=8998#comment-23152</guid>
		<description>This post has been linked for the HOT5 Daily 9/11/2009, at &lt;a href=&quot;http://unreligiousright.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Unreligious Right&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post has been linked for the HOT5 Daily 9/11/2009, at <a href="http://unreligiousright.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">The Unreligious Right</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean Baptiste Say</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/09/blaming-the-free-market-for-government-actions.html/comment-page-1#comment-23141</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean Baptiste Say</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 23:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=8998#comment-23141</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right.

The president&#039;s plan does nothing to bring down healthcare costs because it doesn&#039;t address the causes of cost increases. Nor does it do anything to create a free and fair insurance market.

Current insurance regulations prohibit interstate commerce for insurance, so there really is no true national healthcare. The big insurance companies are actually a whole bunch of smaller companies like United Healthcare of Texas or United Healthcare of Massachusetts. These must all be &quot;arms length&quot; to comply with the law. This means that they are required by law to have redundant staff, systems, etc. That is totally inefficient and prevents any real competition.

The public option would be a national player, but if it is anything like the Medicare I see my grandmother get or the VA benefits I saw my grandfather die on, it will totally suck. But, because it doesn&#039;t have to be 50 separate companies, it will totally win. That isn&#039;t competition. That&#039;s a stacked deck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right.</p>
<p>The president&#8217;s plan does nothing to bring down healthcare costs because it doesn&#8217;t address the causes of cost increases. Nor does it do anything to create a free and fair insurance market.</p>
<p>Current insurance regulations prohibit interstate commerce for insurance, so there really is no true national healthcare. The big insurance companies are actually a whole bunch of smaller companies like United Healthcare of Texas or United Healthcare of Massachusetts. These must all be &#8220;arms length&#8221; to comply with the law. This means that they are required by law to have redundant staff, systems, etc. That is totally inefficient and prevents any real competition.</p>
<p>The public option would be a national player, but if it is anything like the Medicare I see my grandmother get or the VA benefits I saw my grandfather die on, it will totally suck. But, because it doesn&#8217;t have to be 50 separate companies, it will totally win. That isn&#8217;t competition. That&#8217;s a stacked deck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: survivalist</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/09/blaming-the-free-market-for-government-actions.html/comment-page-1#comment-23128</link>
		<dc:creator>survivalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=8998#comment-23128</guid>
		<description>The thing is, there is very little free market anymore.  Banks, insurance companies, hospitals (just to name a few) have all formed organizations and agreed on prices so there is no competition between them.

The government, instead of breaking up the organizations as it should, passes laws that does not address the real issue.  The main problem is that we do not need more laws or regulation, we need real competition between companies to keep the prices down.

Only when the those big trust and monopolies are broken up, then and only then will we have a real free market again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing is, there is very little free market anymore.  Banks, insurance companies, hospitals (just to name a few) have all formed organizations and agreed on prices so there is no competition between them.</p>
<p>The government, instead of breaking up the organizations as it should, passes laws that does not address the real issue.  The main problem is that we do not need more laws or regulation, we need real competition between companies to keep the prices down.</p>
<p>Only when the those big trust and monopolies are broken up, then and only then will we have a real free market again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scp</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/09/blaming-the-free-market-for-government-actions.html/comment-page-1#comment-23124</link>
		<dc:creator>scp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 17:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=8998#comment-23124</guid>
		<description>&quot;By the way, what evidence is there that having 75% of the market in 5 companies is too concentrated?&quot;

I&#039;m no expert, but I&#039;d guess that the evidence is to the contrary.  I seem to remember something about a &quot;rule of 3&quot; from Jagdish Seth&quot;.
http://www.expressindia.com/news/fe/daily/19990319/fec19019.html

If 5 major competitors manage to survive, I might be tempted to conclude that the market is already over-regulated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;By the way, what evidence is there that having 75% of the market in 5 companies is too concentrated?&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m no expert, but I&#8217;d guess that the evidence is to the contrary.  I seem to remember something about a &#8220;rule of 3&#8243; from Jagdish Seth&#8221;.<br />
<a href="http://www.expressindia.com/news/fe/daily/19990319/fec19019.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.expressindia.com/news/fe/daily/19990319/fec19019.html</a></p>
<p>If 5 major competitors manage to survive, I might be tempted to conclude that the market is already over-regulated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomw</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/09/blaming-the-free-market-for-government-actions.html/comment-page-1#comment-23116</link>
		<dc:creator>tomw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=8998#comment-23116</guid>
		<description>Does anybody remember the original American Telephone &amp; Telegraph Company?  It had local service companies in all 50 states[well, close enough].  It was a &#039;regulated monopoly&#039;, and had a &#039;rate of return&#039; based profit system.  However much &#039;plant in service&#039; was functional was the base upon which the profit figure was calculated.  Add more money for a 4E switch, and the rate base increased, and so did profits.

 The real problem with that regulated monopoly was twofold: 1)Congrefs interfered all the time along with the FCC and 2)there were 50 states with different regulation and red tape as determined by the respective PUC (public utility commissions).
 For instance, to offer a 1200 baud modem needed 50 different PUC rulings on how much to charge for its use.  Multiply that by each and every product that was offered and you get an idea of what bureaucracy can do to a company.  It was a hog-tied giant, and when cut and diced into the &quot;Seven Sisters&quot;, aka RBOCs [daughter of Ma Bell?], the amount of state PUC regulations didn&#039;t change.
 If you note, competition in the local service area is non-existent, and the old RBOCs have now joined together back into two large conglomerates. 
  Eleanor&#039;s &quot;never mind&quot; on SNL was a joke about the service the phone company provided.  &quot;We don&#039;t care, we don&#039;t have to!&quot;
 This is exactly what the Obama prophet declares is best for us.  The old Ma Bell system with government Eleanors.
 I can hardly wait.  Black rotary dial medicine, here we come.

tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anybody remember the original American Telephone &amp; Telegraph Company?  It had local service companies in all 50 states[well, close enough].  It was a &#8216;regulated monopoly&#8217;, and had a &#8216;rate of return&#8217; based profit system.  However much &#8216;plant in service&#8217; was functional was the base upon which the profit figure was calculated.  Add more money for a 4E switch, and the rate base increased, and so did profits.</p>
<p> The real problem with that regulated monopoly was twofold: 1)Congrefs interfered all the time along with the FCC and 2)there were 50 states with different regulation and red tape as determined by the respective PUC (public utility commissions).<br />
 For instance, to offer a 1200 baud modem needed 50 different PUC rulings on how much to charge for its use.  Multiply that by each and every product that was offered and you get an idea of what bureaucracy can do to a company.  It was a hog-tied giant, and when cut and diced into the &#8220;Seven Sisters&#8221;, aka RBOCs [daughter of Ma Bell?], the amount of state PUC regulations didn&#8217;t change.<br />
 If you note, competition in the local service area is non-existent, and the old RBOCs have now joined together back into two large conglomerates.<br />
  Eleanor&#8217;s &#8220;never mind&#8221; on SNL was a joke about the service the phone company provided.  &#8220;We don&#8217;t care, we don&#8217;t have to!&#8221;<br />
 This is exactly what the Obama prophet declares is best for us.  The old Ma Bell system with government Eleanors.<br />
 I can hardly wait.  Black rotary dial medicine, here we come.</p>
<p>tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/09/blaming-the-free-market-for-government-actions.html/comment-page-1#comment-23114</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=8998#comment-23114</guid>
		<description>The technologies anticipated to compete with cable are finally maturing with FiOS. Whether its the result of too much or too little deregulation in 1996, cable prices have increased. For now, I&#039;m still forced to get extended cable packages to get the 1 or 2 channels I want to watch. I&#039;m hopeful that in about 5 years, I can legally pick and choose all the shows I enjoy through my high speed FiOS Internet connection. Maybe then the cable companies will finally find a way to deliver a la carte channel options.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The technologies anticipated to compete with cable are finally maturing with FiOS. Whether its the result of too much or too little deregulation in 1996, cable prices have increased. For now, I&#8217;m still forced to get extended cable packages to get the 1 or 2 channels I want to watch. I&#8217;m hopeful that in about 5 years, I can legally pick and choose all the shows I enjoy through my high speed FiOS Internet connection. Maybe then the cable companies will finally find a way to deliver a la carte channel options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barrett</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/09/blaming-the-free-market-for-government-actions.html/comment-page-1#comment-23113</link>
		<dc:creator>Barrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=8998#comment-23113</guid>
		<description>I cannot think of an instance where this process is not present.  If anyone can, please tell me. 

Obama spews all kinds of contradictions (often within the same speech), makes claims that are supposed to sound factual but are never substantiated and cites causes for problems that have nothing to do with the problem at all (e.g. our economic problems are caused by the lack of socialized medicine, the lack energy policy - as if cap n&#039; trade is an energy policy, it&#039;s a tax, and the need for better education).

My brain hurts when I listen to his drivel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot think of an instance where this process is not present.  If anyone can, please tell me. </p>
<p>Obama spews all kinds of contradictions (often within the same speech), makes claims that are supposed to sound factual but are never substantiated and cites causes for problems that have nothing to do with the problem at all (e.g. our economic problems are caused by the lack of socialized medicine, the lack energy policy &#8211; as if cap n&#8217; trade is an energy policy, it&#8217;s a tax, and the need for better education).</p>
<p>My brain hurts when I listen to his drivel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aeronathan</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/09/blaming-the-free-market-for-government-actions.html/comment-page-1#comment-23111</link>
		<dc:creator>aeronathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=8998#comment-23111</guid>
		<description>Funny thing about BCBS of AL,  they&#039;re a non-profit.  So much for the meme that its all evil greedy corps causing these problems....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny thing about BCBS of AL,  they&#8217;re a non-profit.  So much for the meme that its all evil greedy corps causing these problems&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Howe</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/09/blaming-the-free-market-for-government-actions.html/comment-page-1#comment-23110</link>
		<dc:creator>J Howe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=8998#comment-23110</guid>
		<description>Stop trying to confuse the issue with facts and logic!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stop trying to confuse the issue with facts and logic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
