There is just so much wrong with this news blurb, entitled "LA Mother Who Beheaded Son Was Allowed To Keep Him Despite Signs of Mental Illness." Here are just the first four I have thought of:
- Isn't the boy dead, and if so, why is custody an issue?
- Why would a mom who assaults her child be allowed to retain custody?
- Does the "despite signs of mental illness" clause apply to the son or the mother?
- If the mental illness question applies to the mother, can it even be in question?
The article clears some of this up, barely.