<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Awesome Idea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/07/awesome-idea.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/07/awesome-idea.html</link>
	<description>Dispatches from a Small Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 04:16:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: windyridge</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/07/awesome-idea.html/comment-page-1#comment-20853</link>
		<dc:creator>windyridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 01:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=8499#comment-20853</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t want milk from China! In fact I don&#039;t want anything food related from China.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t want milk from China! In fact I don&#8217;t want anything food related from China.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeB</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/07/awesome-idea.html/comment-page-1#comment-20812</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=8499#comment-20812</guid>
		<description>feeblemind -- I have to disagree that people don&#039;t read the labels. The notorious warnings on the labels for Olestra potato chips come to mind... 

But you are right -- the labelling would wind up being irrelevant to consumer behavior cause the labels would be on so many products. But the point would be that it&#039;d be out there as a constant reminder of how the gov has insert itself into the market, for better or worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>feeblemind &#8212; I have to disagree that people don&#8217;t read the labels. The notorious warnings on the labels for Olestra potato chips come to mind&#8230; </p>
<p>But you are right &#8212; the labelling would wind up being irrelevant to consumer behavior cause the labels would be on so many products. But the point would be that it&#8217;d be out there as a constant reminder of how the gov has insert itself into the market, for better or worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig S</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/07/awesome-idea.html/comment-page-1#comment-20799</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=8499#comment-20799</guid>
		<description>Hmmm...

I see some good arguments for and against...

I&#039;d love to see farm subsidies and tariffs decline or be eliminated, but as mentioned, is it worth the increase in government oversight leading to a larger beaurorcracy? And, of course, just because tariffs are eliminated, do we really want to drink milk imported from China, for example, as pointed out by Ian Random? Hmmm....the answer doesn&#039;t look so simple.

But hey, keep trying, there&#039;s gotta be a way!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;</p>
<p>I see some good arguments for and against&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to see farm subsidies and tariffs decline or be eliminated, but as mentioned, is it worth the increase in government oversight leading to a larger beaurorcracy? And, of course, just because tariffs are eliminated, do we really want to drink milk imported from China, for example, as pointed out by Ian Random? Hmmm&#8230;.the answer doesn&#8217;t look so simple.</p>
<p>But hey, keep trying, there&#8217;s gotta be a way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Random</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/07/awesome-idea.html/comment-page-1#comment-20769</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Random</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=8499#comment-20769</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more, but I would want to make it mandatory for companies that produce and market the raw ingredients like dairies. I would make it optional for those that use the ingredients like bakers as they don&#039;t really have a choice. As for Bart Hall&#039;s point about moving the agencies around, that&#039;s even better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more, but I would want to make it mandatory for companies that produce and market the raw ingredients like dairies. I would make it optional for those that use the ingredients like bakers as they don&#8217;t really have a choice. As for Bart Hall&#8217;s point about moving the agencies around, that&#8217;s even better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: threecollie</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/07/awesome-idea.html/comment-page-1#comment-20765</link>
		<dc:creator>threecollie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 22:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=8499#comment-20765</guid>
		<description>I am not exactly a fan of farm subsidies. They skew commodity prices to other farmers as well as in the store. However, much of the Dept of Ag budget goes into people feeding programs...a larger percentage all the time.  

Right now pretty much every dairy farmer in the country is subsidizing somebody else&#039;s cheap milk. That includes farmers in California.
Cost of production in the USA, where nearly every breath a cow takes is inspected by somebody, equals at least sixteen dollars per hundredweight. The price paid to farmers right now, set, by the way by the government, is between ten and twelve dollars per hundredweight.
 
How much of a decrease in price have you seen in the stores? 

Of course, if our dairy farmers pack it in and you don&#039;t mind melamine and leather powder in your milk, China&#039;s fast-growing dairy industry will be delighted to fill all your needs......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not exactly a fan of farm subsidies. They skew commodity prices to other farmers as well as in the store. However, much of the Dept of Ag budget goes into people feeding programs&#8230;a larger percentage all the time.  </p>
<p>Right now pretty much every dairy farmer in the country is subsidizing somebody else&#8217;s cheap milk. That includes farmers in California.<br />
Cost of production in the USA, where nearly every breath a cow takes is inspected by somebody, equals at least sixteen dollars per hundredweight. The price paid to farmers right now, set, by the way by the government, is between ten and twelve dollars per hundredweight.</p>
<p>How much of a decrease in price have you seen in the stores? </p>
<p>Of course, if our dairy farmers pack it in and you don&#8217;t mind melamine and leather powder in your milk, China&#8217;s fast-growing dairy industry will be delighted to fill all your needs&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: feeblemind</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/07/awesome-idea.html/comment-page-1#comment-20764</link>
		<dc:creator>feeblemind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 22:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=8499#comment-20764</guid>
		<description>You could add to the expense of packaging food by adding the label, but the effect would be negligible. Perhaps Ivy Leaguers read the fine print on food packages but the unwashed don&#039;t. BTW let&#039;s not forget to increase the bureaucracy to administrate and enforce compliance. Yeah. Let&#039;s just expand Government a little more. What could go wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could add to the expense of packaging food by adding the label, but the effect would be negligible. Perhaps Ivy Leaguers read the fine print on food packages but the unwashed don&#8217;t. BTW let&#8217;s not forget to increase the bureaucracy to administrate and enforce compliance. Yeah. Let&#8217;s just expand Government a little more. What could go wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorenzo (from downunder)</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/07/awesome-idea.html/comment-page-1#comment-20758</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorenzo (from downunder)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=8499#comment-20758</guid>
		<description>Yes please! What a great idea :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes please! What a great idea <img src='http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Swink</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/07/awesome-idea.html/comment-page-1#comment-20756</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Swink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=8499#comment-20756</guid>
		<description>My god, what a barrage of non-sequiturs James has had to endure in the comments to his article. With the stupid so entrenched, who has any hope of ending these protectionist measures?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My god, what a barrage of non-sequiturs James has had to endure in the comments to his article. With the stupid so entrenched, who has any hope of ending these protectionist measures?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Ellis</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/07/awesome-idea.html/comment-page-1#comment-20755</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=8499#comment-20755</guid>
		<description>Great idea! They will have to put it on GM and Chrysler cars too, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great idea! They will have to put it on GM and Chrysler cars too, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OneEyedMan</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/07/awesome-idea.html/comment-page-1#comment-20751</link>
		<dc:creator>OneEyedMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=8499#comment-20751</guid>
		<description>It would have to be a direct benefit or it would be unworkable.
That is, if they place a tariff on imported wine and that makes people drink more domestic beer, I would assume that would not require the label. 
Otherwise, who is to say what domestic (or imported) products are more expensive because of a certain tariff?
At least if tariffs are high on imported cars then we can clearly say that domestic ones receive a price advantage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would have to be a direct benefit or it would be unworkable.<br />
That is, if they place a tariff on imported wine and that makes people drink more domestic beer, I would assume that would not require the label.<br />
Otherwise, who is to say what domestic (or imported) products are more expensive because of a certain tariff?<br />
At least if tariffs are high on imported cars then we can clearly say that domestic ones receive a price advantage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
