Comments on: The Brits Are Really Losing It

By: Michael

Michael — Sun, 28 Jun 2009 01:45:21 +0000

At present the Brits fly unmanned aircraft over the houses of their people with infrared cameras to get a heat signature so the government can impose higher taxes on them. At night, vans drive around scanning each house for electronic devices that can pick up radio waves so the government can impose higher taxes on them. On average, a person in London is photographed 100 per day by the government. I know of many in the UK that are on dial up so they can’t access internet resources. The people of the UK don’t even get the chance to have some bling.

By: Dr. T

Dr. T — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 23:34:32 +0000

“I wonder what kind of due process you get if the police come and seize your bling. What do you have to do to prove you have it legitimately?”

We have this in the US. Cash, cars, boats, and homes of anyone that law enforcement believes has earned money by selling illegal drugs are seized every day. Seizures often occur without proof of wrongdoing or without charges being filed. Citizens who attempted to prove their innocence (a bit backwards, isn’t it?) and reclaim their property have always failed. So, if a local cop dislikes your but really likes your SUV, he can tell his chief that you were selling cocaine packets from your SUV. If the chief agrees, the cops swoop in, take your SUV, and add it to their cache of confiscated goods.

Our situation seems worse than what the British face. At least they investigate before confiscating “bling.”

By: ElamBend

ElamBend — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 22:14:31 +0000

I wonder what kind of due process you get if the police come and seize your bling. What do you have to do to prove you have it legitimately?

By: Bob Smith

Bob Smith — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 21:04:33 +0000

I wonder how one “knows” that your neighbor is living off the proceeds of crime.

By: Michael

Michael — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 18:18:34 +0000

I can understand the welcome mat issue. When you think just how invasive the British government has become in the daily household of its citizens, I’m sure there are few welcome mats that actual say “welcome.”

By: Michael

Michael — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 18:01:47 +0000

There are people in the US working on the furniture problem. From coyote:

In Alabama it is illegal to recommend shades of paint without a
license. In Nevada it is illegal to move any large piece of furniture
for purposes of design without a license. In fact, hundreds of people
have been prosecuted in Alabama and Nevada for practicing “interior
design” without a license. Getting a license is no easy task,
typically requiring at least 4 years of education and 2 years of
apprenticeship. Why do we need licenses laws for interior designers?
According to the American Society of Interior Designers (ASID) because,

Every decision an interior designer makes in one way or another affects the health, safety, and welfare of the public.

By: James H

James H — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 17:22:04 +0000

Furniture inside the flat is also a fire hazard and trip hazard. Once you start on this slippery slope, it’s a very long fall. Utensils can be dangerous, and don’t forget that if you drop a plate on your toe you could break it. Sometimes people slip in the tub as well.

By: Doug

Doug — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 16:51:27 +0000

I rather like the idea for this country. If implemented, we could easily take out everyone in Congress and the Senate. How, pray tell, can a certain US president, whose entire career consisted of “community organizer,” suddenly become a multi-millionaire only months after he enters the Senate? Indeed, too much bling goin’ on there in Congress.