<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Double Standard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/06/double-standard-2.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/06/double-standard-2.html</link>
	<description>Dispatches from a Small Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:46:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/06/double-standard-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-19694</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 23:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=8109#comment-19694</guid>
		<description>@Truth Teller - Nowhere in THIS article is there any mention of executives or middle managers.

But employment classification isn&#039;t even the issue. The issue is a city governments choice to pay any discretionary bonuses at all.  If these employees had already reached a clearly defined salary cap, great! They new the cap was in place, because it was specifically outlined in the cityâ€™s Pay Ordinance. The point of a cap it to not go over it. It seems like the city just decided to go around the cap.

THIS story seems to be flat out correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Truth Teller &#8211; Nowhere in THIS article is there any mention of executives or middle managers.</p>
<p>But employment classification isn&#8217;t even the issue. The issue is a city governments choice to pay any discretionary bonuses at all.  If these employees had already reached a clearly defined salary cap, great! They new the cap was in place, because it was specifically outlined in the cityâ€™s Pay Ordinance. The point of a cap it to not go over it. It seems like the city just decided to go around the cap.</p>
<p>THIS story seems to be flat out correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Truth Teller</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/06/double-standard-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-19685</link>
		<dc:creator>Truth Teller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 21:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=8109#comment-19685</guid>
		<description>This story was flat out wrong. No bonuses whatsoever were given to city executives/middle managers, despite the City Manager repeatedly telling the Channel 5 reporter that no bonuses were given. The &quot;bonuses&quot; were in fact longevity pay to employees who are topped out in their salary range, which is specifically outlined in the city&#039;s Pay Ordinance. It&#039;s the same longevity pay given to front-line and non-executive employees. Ironically, the AR for front-line and non-executive employees reads almost exactly like the Pay Ordinace on longevity pay. The reporter conveniently failed to include this in her story. 

It&#039;s this type of shaddy, shabby journalism that gives journalists a bad (as if they needed any help) and makes residents hate their government. We deserve better.

Truth Teller</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This story was flat out wrong. No bonuses whatsoever were given to city executives/middle managers, despite the City Manager repeatedly telling the Channel 5 reporter that no bonuses were given. The &#8220;bonuses&#8221; were in fact longevity pay to employees who are topped out in their salary range, which is specifically outlined in the city&#8217;s Pay Ordinance. It&#8217;s the same longevity pay given to front-line and non-executive employees. Ironically, the AR for front-line and non-executive employees reads almost exactly like the Pay Ordinace on longevity pay. The reporter conveniently failed to include this in her story. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s this type of shaddy, shabby journalism that gives journalists a bad (as if they needed any help) and makes residents hate their government. We deserve better.</p>
<p>Truth Teller</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

