<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What About the Rest of Us?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/03/what-about-the-rest-of-us.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/03/what-about-the-rest-of-us.html</link>
	<description>Dispatches from a Small Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:39:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vercingetorix</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/03/what-about-the-rest-of-us.html/comment-page-1#comment-17771</link>
		<dc:creator>Vercingetorix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=7489#comment-17771</guid>
		<description>I must disagree with Reason Magazine here.  The Obama amicus brief is NOT &quot;somewhat encouraging.&quot;  In fact, it is discouraging-- though par for the course.  For 30 or 40 years now one major procedural device for facilitating government officials&#039; and their cronies&#039; abuse of citizens has been making them immune to process.  It is perfectly hollow to say &quot;the plaintiff&#039;s rights were violated but the people who did it are immune to suit.&quot;  Without a remedy there is no right.  Besides immunizing themselves, bureaucrats have also immunized banks, insurance companies, telephone companies, and nearly everyone else, provided, of course, that they&#039;re assisting bureaucrats to oppress people.  &quot;Immunity envy&quot; afflicts all bureaucrats and their pet contractors now-- every time one of them misbehaves and gets hailed into court s/he claims immunity and the courts generally grant it.  It&#039;s the ancien rÃ©gime all over again with government and quasi-government actors as the first and second estates.  There may be no remedy short of &quot;les aristocrates Ã  la lanterne!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must disagree with Reason Magazine here.  The Obama amicus brief is NOT &#8220;somewhat encouraging.&#8221;  In fact, it is discouraging&#8211; though par for the course.  For 30 or 40 years now one major procedural device for facilitating government officials&#8217; and their cronies&#8217; abuse of citizens has been making them immune to process.  It is perfectly hollow to say &#8220;the plaintiff&#8217;s rights were violated but the people who did it are immune to suit.&#8221;  Without a remedy there is no right.  Besides immunizing themselves, bureaucrats have also immunized banks, insurance companies, telephone companies, and nearly everyone else, provided, of course, that they&#8217;re assisting bureaucrats to oppress people.  &#8220;Immunity envy&#8221; afflicts all bureaucrats and their pet contractors now&#8211; every time one of them misbehaves and gets hailed into court s/he claims immunity and the courts generally grant it.  It&#8217;s the ancien rÃ©gime all over again with government and quasi-government actors as the first and second estates.  There may be no remedy short of &#8220;les aristocrates Ã  la lanterne!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Wise</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/03/what-about-the-rest-of-us.html/comment-page-1#comment-17750</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Wise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=7489#comment-17750</guid>
		<description>Qualified immunity for an unclear law...it worked for Geitner.  Oh wait, I&#039;m sorry, that was clear violation. I misspoke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Qualified immunity for an unclear law&#8230;it worked for Geitner.  Oh wait, I&#8217;m sorry, that was clear violation. I misspoke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

