<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maybe Mark Sanford Was On To Something</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/03/maybe-mark-sanford-was-on-to-something.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/03/maybe-mark-sanford-was-on-to-something.html</link>
	<description>Dispatches from a Small Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:12:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/03/maybe-mark-sanford-was-on-to-something.html/comment-page-1#comment-17800</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 01:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=7417#comment-17800</guid>
		<description>Anti-Mark Sanford Rally Planned for April 1, 2009

â€¦angry state residents and state legislators are now facing the prospect of drafting two budgets â€” one that includes $700 million in federal stimulus funds over the next two years, and one that doesnâ€™t.

Sen. Hugh Leatherman says what the Legislature must do, given the uncertainty over whether the state can accept the federal money without the request of Gov. Sanford, who has said he wonâ€™t take the money.

In a letter to the governor, Leatherman called the situation â€œchaosâ€ and warned of dire consequences for state schools and prisons without the stimulus money.

â€œOverriding your decision could lead to chaos in the courts,â€ Leatherman wrote. â€œFailure to override your decision most assuredly would lead to chaos in the budget.â€

Rep. Jim Clyburn contends that the U.S. Department of Education could bypass both the governor and legislators to help South Carolina schools directly.

Leathermanâ€™s view that the matter could be headed for the courts might be the most clearheaded. That canâ€™t be good for anyone: It would mean that even if South Carolina eventually gets the money, it could be long after itâ€™s most needed.

Opponents of Sanfordâ€™s position plan to hold a rally on Wednesday, April 1, in front of the State House. The rally will run from 5:30 to 6:30 p.m.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anti-Mark Sanford Rally Planned for April 1, 2009</p>
<p>â€¦angry state residents and state legislators are now facing the prospect of drafting two budgets â€” one that includes $700 million in federal stimulus funds over the next two years, and one that doesnâ€™t.</p>
<p>Sen. Hugh Leatherman says what the Legislature must do, given the uncertainty over whether the state can accept the federal money without the request of Gov. Sanford, who has said he wonâ€™t take the money.</p>
<p>In a letter to the governor, Leatherman called the situation â€œchaosâ€ and warned of dire consequences for state schools and prisons without the stimulus money.</p>
<p>â€œOverriding your decision could lead to chaos in the courts,â€ Leatherman wrote. â€œFailure to override your decision most assuredly would lead to chaos in the budget.â€</p>
<p>Rep. Jim Clyburn contends that the U.S. Department of Education could bypass both the governor and legislators to help South Carolina schools directly.</p>
<p>Leathermanâ€™s view that the matter could be headed for the courts might be the most clearheaded. That canâ€™t be good for anyone: It would mean that even if South Carolina eventually gets the money, it could be long after itâ€™s most needed.</p>
<p>Opponents of Sanfordâ€™s position plan to hold a rally on Wednesday, April 1, in front of the State House. The rally will run from 5:30 to 6:30 p.m.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GU</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/03/maybe-mark-sanford-was-on-to-something.html/comment-page-1#comment-17613</link>
		<dc:creator>GU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=7417#comment-17613</guid>
		<description>Other gems brought to a state near you via conditional grants from the federal government include the National Minimum Drinking Age Act (which forced states to raise their drinking age to 21 or lose federal highway funds) and No Child Left Behind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other gems brought to a state near you via conditional grants from the federal government include the National Minimum Drinking Age Act (which forced states to raise their drinking age to 21 or lose federal highway funds) and No Child Left Behind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

