<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Really, Really Awful</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/02/really-really-awful.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/02/really-really-awful.html</link>
	<description>Dispatches from a Small Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:42:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/02/really-really-awful.html/comment-page-1#comment-16946</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=7217#comment-16946</guid>
		<description>To make the apples a little bit more like oranges, I wonder how well Wal-Mart would do if there were significant numbers of people shooting at them?  It is a lot easier to deal with commercial security (where the concern is theft of assets) than military supply-chain security (where the concerns include espionage, loss of life, etc).

Wal-Mart does do logistics quite well - hopefully the FedGov will take a few hints from them...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To make the apples a little bit more like oranges, I wonder how well Wal-Mart would do if there were significant numbers of people shooting at them?  It is a lot easier to deal with commercial security (where the concern is theft of assets) than military supply-chain security (where the concerns include espionage, loss of life, etc).</p>
<p>Wal-Mart does do logistics quite well &#8211; hopefully the FedGov will take a few hints from them&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/02/really-really-awful.html/comment-page-1#comment-16944</link>
		<dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=7217#comment-16944</guid>
		<description>MHodak has it right - it&#039;s not reasonable to expect &quot;Military Precision&quot; from folks who gave us the acronyms FUBAR and SNAFU.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MHodak has it right &#8211; it&#8217;s not reasonable to expect &#8220;Military Precision&#8221; from folks who gave us the acronyms FUBAR and SNAFU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDK</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/02/really-really-awful.html/comment-page-1#comment-16938</link>
		<dc:creator>TDK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=7217#comment-16938</guid>
		<description>As regards your postscript, Omaha is a funny example to pick for demonstrating competency. Of the five beaches, Omaha was the only one that came close to failure. 

That&#039;s not to dispute the heroism of those involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As regards your postscript, Omaha is a funny example to pick for demonstrating competency. Of the five beaches, Omaha was the only one that came close to failure. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s not to dispute the heroism of those involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shenpen</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/02/really-really-awful.html/comment-page-1#comment-16936</link>
		<dc:creator>Shenpen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=7217#comment-16936</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be interested in your story about going from conservatism to libertarianism, but first define what you meant by conservatism, as it can mean many things. At one end of the scale, it&#039;s a sceptical pluralism: a practical, common-sense aversion to any kind of rationalistic ideology. This end is exemplified by people like John Kekes, Michael Oakeshott, a bit back in history: Giambattista Vico etc. This is the kind of conservatism I like. 

At the other end of the scale is religious-nationalistic traditionalism. This is the kind of conservatism I don&#039;t like so much. This other end is like Salazaar or perhaps Franco and in a much milder and democratic way, Bush and his supporters.

And there are and were  many folks in between: Barry Goldwater was very close to the first end, so is Vaclav Klaus in Czech and Donald Tusk in Poland, Edmund Burke and David Cameron are/were one step closer to the second but still much closer to the first than to the second, Bill Buckley right in the middle of it, Pat Buchanan is much closer to the second end etc.  etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be interested in your story about going from conservatism to libertarianism, but first define what you meant by conservatism, as it can mean many things. At one end of the scale, it&#8217;s a sceptical pluralism: a practical, common-sense aversion to any kind of rationalistic ideology. This end is exemplified by people like John Kekes, Michael Oakeshott, a bit back in history: Giambattista Vico etc. This is the kind of conservatism I like. </p>
<p>At the other end of the scale is religious-nationalistic traditionalism. This is the kind of conservatism I don&#8217;t like so much. This other end is like Salazaar or perhaps Franco and in a much milder and democratic way, Bush and his supporters.</p>
<p>And there are and were  many folks in between: Barry Goldwater was very close to the first end, so is Vaclav Klaus in Czech and Donald Tusk in Poland, Edmund Burke and David Cameron are/were one step closer to the second but still much closer to the first than to the second, Bill Buckley right in the middle of it, Pat Buchanan is much closer to the second end etc.  etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHodak</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/02/really-really-awful.html/comment-page-1#comment-16934</link>
		<dc:creator>MHodak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=7217#comment-16934</guid>
		<description>Growing up as an Air Force brat instilled a couple of attitudes that I carry to this day:  (1) I have a very high regard for individuals who have served in our military--I tend to trust them implicitly (especially senior enlisted/junior officers types), and (2) the military as an institution is, to use one of their own terms, FUBAR.  Everyone in the military knows that &quot;military efficiency&quot; is an oxymoron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Growing up as an Air Force brat instilled a couple of attitudes that I carry to this day:  (1) I have a very high regard for individuals who have served in our military&#8211;I tend to trust them implicitly (especially senior enlisted/junior officers types), and (2) the military as an institution is, to use one of their own terms, FUBAR.  Everyone in the military knows that &#8220;military efficiency&#8221; is an oxymoron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2009/02/really-really-awful.html/comment-page-1#comment-16931</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coyoteblog.com/?p=7217#comment-16931</guid>
		<description>I would be interested to hear your personal evolution of going from conservative to libertarian, as I straddle the fence myself. Have you already made a post like that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be interested to hear your personal evolution of going from conservative to libertarian, as I straddle the fence myself. Have you already made a post like that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
