<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quantum of Solace</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2008/11/quantum-of-solace.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2008/11/quantum-of-solace.html</link>
	<description>Dispatches from a Small Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:41:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PeterGunn</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2008/11/quantum-of-solace.html/comment-page-1#comment-14743</link>
		<dc:creator>PeterGunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.warrenmeyer.net/coyote_blog/2008/11/quantum-of-solace.html#comment-14743</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Saw the movie over the Thanksgiving Holiday with the entire family: four kids and two spouses. I&#039;m so relieved to read that I&#039;m not the only person who didn&#039;t enjoy this movie! &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The younger the kid, the more they enjoyed this fast paced series of chases and fights, lacking any plot connection. It felt as though one&#039;s head should be on a swivel to be able to keep up with what was going on, even though it didn&#039;t make any sense most of the time. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There could have been so much more development with the plot: M&#039;s relationship with Bond, why we found ourselves in Haiti, Bolivia, remote desert resort, flying a DC-3, etc. It was a jumble for the sake of singular events of action... I felt that feeling of a lackluster effort from the opening car chase seen throughout the entire mess.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw the movie over the Thanksgiving Holiday with the entire family: four kids and two spouses. I&#8217;m so relieved to read that I&#8217;m not the only person who didn&#8217;t enjoy this movie! </p>
<p>The younger the kid, the more they enjoyed this fast paced series of chases and fights, lacking any plot connection. It felt as though one&#8217;s head should be on a swivel to be able to keep up with what was going on, even though it didn&#8217;t make any sense most of the time. </p>
<p>There could have been so much more development with the plot: M&#8217;s relationship with Bond, why we found ourselves in Haiti, Bolivia, remote desert resort, flying a DC-3, etc. It was a jumble for the sake of singular events of action&#8230; I felt that feeling of a lackluster effort from the opening car chase seen throughout the entire mess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2008/11/quantum-of-solace.html/comment-page-1#comment-14742</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 13:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.warrenmeyer.net/coyote_blog/2008/11/quantum-of-solace.html#comment-14742</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Why did they change the director? Casino Royal had a great action director with a great Bond movie previously under his belt (Goldeneye). They replaced him with the director of &quot;Monsters Ball&quot;??? &lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why did they change the director? Casino Royal had a great action director with a great Bond movie previously under his belt (Goldeneye). They replaced him with the director of &#8220;Monsters Ball&#8221;??? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2008/11/quantum-of-solace.html/comment-page-1#comment-14741</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 02:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.warrenmeyer.net/coyote_blog/2008/11/quantum-of-solace.html#comment-14741</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I am an old school book Bond fan and I enjoyed the film. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The action sequences I can agree they reflect too much of the Bourne school of movies and too jumpy. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That said I love how they are slowly playing out the plot and making you pay attention to understand the plot. I like that they are only slow spoon feeding us this mysterious villian group without anything to go on. It is far more believable and logical that they won&#039;t suddenly have all the answers and that the audience expects it means you have gotten to used to the spoon feed plots of Hollywood. The Opera scene was great! &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The darker gritter feel is alot closer to a book Bond than we have had and I am really enjoying the ride.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am an old school book Bond fan and I enjoyed the film. </p>
<p>The action sequences I can agree they reflect too much of the Bourne school of movies and too jumpy. </p>
<p>That said I love how they are slowly playing out the plot and making you pay attention to understand the plot. I like that they are only slow spoon feeding us this mysterious villian group without anything to go on. It is far more believable and logical that they won&#8217;t suddenly have all the answers and that the audience expects it means you have gotten to used to the spoon feed plots of Hollywood. The Opera scene was great! </p>
<p>The darker gritter feel is alot closer to a book Bond than we have had and I am really enjoying the ride.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the asset</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2008/11/quantum-of-solace.html/comment-page-1#comment-14740</link>
		<dc:creator>the asset</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.warrenmeyer.net/coyote_blog/2008/11/quantum-of-solace.html#comment-14740</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;QoS not a good sign. i had high hopes for the bond franchise after casino royale: craig makes a excellent bond; no sniggering boobie double-entendres; none of the bubblegum and BS crap that had made the series esentially unwatchable. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;and then i saw QoS. *sigh*. maybe it&#039;s just the sophomore jinx - i hope so - but QoS is 15% the movie that casino royale was. gigantic plot holes; glamorous locations like, oh, *haiti*, and the nazca desert (wow!!!); lots of the deadly &quot;plot development is too hard! let&#039;s just blow up a big ol&#039; building&quot; incompetent director syndrome; and......right off the bat at the start of the movie....&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;they&#039;ve got craig doing the same tired, stupid, roger moore/pierce brosnan idiocy of &quot;bond manages not to get shot by the guy shooting automatic weapons at him from close range by *ducking the bullets*&quot;. baaaaad omen, folks. &lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>QoS not a good sign. i had high hopes for the bond franchise after casino royale: craig makes a excellent bond; no sniggering boobie double-entendres; none of the bubblegum and BS crap that had made the series esentially unwatchable. </p>
<p>and then i saw QoS. *sigh*. maybe it&#8217;s just the sophomore jinx &#8211; i hope so &#8211; but QoS is 15% the movie that casino royale was. gigantic plot holes; glamorous locations like, oh, *haiti*, and the nazca desert (wow!!!); lots of the deadly &#8220;plot development is too hard! let&#8217;s just blow up a big ol&#8217; building&#8221; incompetent director syndrome; and&#8230;&#8230;right off the bat at the start of the movie&#8230;.</p>
<p>they&#8217;ve got craig doing the same tired, stupid, roger moore/pierce brosnan idiocy of &#8220;bond manages not to get shot by the guy shooting automatic weapons at him from close range by *ducking the bullets*&#8221;. baaaaad omen, folks. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick C</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2008/11/quantum-of-solace.html/comment-page-1#comment-14739</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 18:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.warrenmeyer.net/coyote_blog/2008/11/quantum-of-solace.html#comment-14739</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t think that it was *just* Bolivia, not that that necessarily invalidates the objection.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that it was *just* Bolivia, not that that necessarily invalidates the objection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2008/11/quantum-of-solace.html/comment-page-1#comment-14738</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.warrenmeyer.net/coyote_blog/2008/11/quantum-of-solace.html#comment-14738</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Alright, I thought this movie kicked major ass.  However, this was not a Bond movie.  This was clearly a Bourne movie feature Bond: same camera work, and they even stole the &quot;We&#039;re going to have a fight using household objects&quot; scene.  What I thought it actually did better than the first Bourne movie was that at no point did I say, &quot;Oh jesus, another chase scene?&quot;  I never really felt the near non-stop action was forced.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Frankly the Bond series, while mostly entertaining, were always pure camp, and that angle should have been left to die when Connery left.  He pulled it off, and none of the successors could even come close to delivering those cheeseball lines.  At least they realized this and took it in a new direction with Craig.  Yeah, the plot had some major WTF, but as pure action movies go, this was pretty good.  &lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright, I thought this movie kicked major ass.  However, this was not a Bond movie.  This was clearly a Bourne movie feature Bond: same camera work, and they even stole the &#8220;We&#8217;re going to have a fight using household objects&#8221; scene.  What I thought it actually did better than the first Bourne movie was that at no point did I say, &#8220;Oh jesus, another chase scene?&#8221;  I never really felt the near non-stop action was forced.</p>
<p>Frankly the Bond series, while mostly entertaining, were always pure camp, and that angle should have been left to die when Connery left.  He pulled it off, and none of the successors could even come close to delivering those cheeseball lines.  At least they realized this and took it in a new direction with Craig.  Yeah, the plot had some major WTF, but as pure action movies go, this was pretty good.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2008/11/quantum-of-solace.html/comment-page-1#comment-14737</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.warrenmeyer.net/coyote_blog/2008/11/quantum-of-solace.html#comment-14737</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Since it&#039;s been spoiled, I&#039;ll ask: Corner the market on water?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So the Bond films are now borrowing their plots from such cinematic blockbusters as &lt;a href=&quot;http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0290095/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Tuxedo&lt;/a&gt;?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;At least Jackie Chan knows how to choreograph a fight scene.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since it&#8217;s been spoiled, I&#8217;ll ask: Corner the market on water?</p>
<p>So the Bond films are now borrowing their plots from such cinematic blockbusters as <a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0290095/" rel="nofollow">The Tuxedo</a>?</p>
<p>At least Jackie Chan knows how to choreograph a fight scene.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil in Sonoma</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2008/11/quantum-of-solace.html/comment-page-1#comment-14736</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil in Sonoma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.warrenmeyer.net/coyote_blog/2008/11/quantum-of-solace.html#comment-14736</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Bolivia: the next BRIC.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I enjoyed QoS in the moment, but I was grateful for the exegesis of its Byzantine plot posted (already!) on Wikipedia.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bolivia: the next BRIC.</p>
<p>I enjoyed QoS in the moment, but I was grateful for the exegesis of its Byzantine plot posted (already!) on Wikipedia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coyote</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2008/11/quantum-of-solace.html/comment-page-1#comment-14735</link>
		<dc:creator>coyote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.warrenmeyer.net/coyote_blog/2008/11/quantum-of-solace.html#comment-14735</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I will go ahead and put this spoiler here, since the ground has already been broken above.  Did I really just watch a movie where an evil cabal that is powerful enough to place its agents in the inner circles of world leaders has hatched a plot to obtain ... the water utility contract in Bolivia?  WTF???&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will go ahead and put this spoiler here, since the ground has already been broken above.  Did I really just watch a movie where an evil cabal that is powerful enough to place its agents in the inner circles of world leaders has hatched a plot to obtain &#8230; the water utility contract in Bolivia?  WTF???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xpatUSA</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2008/11/quantum-of-solace.html/comment-page-1#comment-14734</link>
		<dc:creator>xpatUSA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.warrenmeyer.net/coyote_blog/2008/11/quantum-of-solace.html#comment-14734</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Haven&#039;t seen the movie but your first comment was spot-on re: the jerky camera action, with wild zooms and sub-second video bites. It&#039;s not just in movies - it&#039;s in trailers, commercials, DIY documentaries, PBS sewing programs, ad nauseam.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I though I was the only person on the planet that dislikes that style. Yuk!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;T.C.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t seen the movie but your first comment was spot-on re: the jerky camera action, with wild zooms and sub-second video bites. It&#8217;s not just in movies &#8211; it&#8217;s in trailers, commercials, DIY documentaries, PBS sewing programs, ad nauseam.</p>
<p>I though I was the only person on the planet that dislikes that style. Yuk!</p>
<p>T.C.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
