<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Differential Inflation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2008/09/differential-in.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2008/09/differential-in.html</link>
	<description>Dispatches from a Small Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:39:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: xpatUSA</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2008/09/differential-in.html/comment-page-1#comment-13798</link>
		<dc:creator>xpatUSA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 19:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2008/09/differential-in.html#comment-13798</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;My view is that, if we do use the word &quot;inflation&quot;, we should qualify it with that which is being inflated. Thus, instead of just saying &quot;inflation rate&quot; or &quot;rate of inflation&quot;, we would say &quot;rate of inflation of the M3 money supply&quot; for example.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Having said that, is not &quot;inflation&quot; usually taken per se to mean the rate of change of the price of a fixed basket of goods? (That is, before our fine government distorted that meaning with weightings, hedonics, substitute of &quot;equivalent rent&quot; for mortgage, removal of fuel and other costs, plus all those other tricks).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If so, then the fixed basket of goods itself is incorrect - if the intention is to actually include les riches in any discussion on the cost or the quality of living.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ted&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My view is that, if we do use the word &#8220;inflation&#8221;, we should qualify it with that which is being inflated. Thus, instead of just saying &#8220;inflation rate&#8221; or &#8220;rate of inflation&#8221;, we would say &#8220;rate of inflation of the M3 money supply&#8221; for example.</p>
<p>Having said that, is not &#8220;inflation&#8221; usually taken per se to mean the rate of change of the price of a fixed basket of goods? (That is, before our fine government distorted that meaning with weightings, hedonics, substitute of &#8220;equivalent rent&#8221; for mortgage, removal of fuel and other costs, plus all those other tricks).</p>
<p>If so, then the fixed basket of goods itself is incorrect &#8211; if the intention is to actually include les riches in any discussion on the cost or the quality of living.</p>
<p>Ted</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandman</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2008/09/differential-in.html/comment-page-1#comment-13797</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 19:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2008/09/differential-in.html#comment-13797</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I would suspect that the biggest benefits come to those just above the poor all the way up to the middle class. The basic necessities in life - food, shelter, clothing - don&#039;t seem to be much cheaper (and in some cases are more expensive). But those things that make life better - DVD players, cars, computers, appliances, etc. - are all constantly getting cheaper or better. And inflation rates do a bad job of measuring improvements to things. A $15,000 car today is functionally similar to a $15,000 car from 1990, but no one would suggest that today&#039;s car is better in almost every way (comfort, safety, radio, etc.) I just don&#039;t know how you measure that improvement in life.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would suspect that the biggest benefits come to those just above the poor all the way up to the middle class. The basic necessities in life &#8211; food, shelter, clothing &#8211; don&#8217;t seem to be much cheaper (and in some cases are more expensive). But those things that make life better &#8211; DVD players, cars, computers, appliances, etc. &#8211; are all constantly getting cheaper or better. And inflation rates do a bad job of measuring improvements to things. A $15,000 car today is functionally similar to a $15,000 car from 1990, but no one would suggest that today&#8217;s car is better in almost every way (comfort, safety, radio, etc.) I just don&#8217;t know how you measure that improvement in life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

