<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Power of Institutional Focus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2008/05/the-power-of-in.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2008/05/the-power-of-in.html</link>
	<description>Dispatches from a Small Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 04:16:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kent Gatewood</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2008/05/the-power-of-in.html/comment-page-1#comment-11286</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent Gatewood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 17:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2008/05/the-power-of-in.html #comment-11286</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Stan how does an honor code deal with group projects and study groups?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stan how does an honor code deal with group projects and study groups?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2008/05/the-power-of-in.html/comment-page-1#comment-11285</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 14:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2008/05/the-power-of-in.html #comment-11285</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have long been a proponent of even more focus that what is described here. Why does every major college institution offer such a wide array of degree choices? That is just plain ridiculous and not cost efficient. I understand that in some ways colleges and universities &quot;specialize&quot; in certain subjects. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Why does the University of Minnesota, the University of Minnesota-Duluth,  St. Cloud St., and WInona St (to use college and universities in my local and just to name a few) all offer the exact same types of degrees (rhetorical)?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The fact is that our post-secondary education system has become a bureacratic system of turf protection and funding wars. THe concern for the taxpayer that supports these schools, parents that pay tuition, and students that get educations at the institutions has seemingly evaporated.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Further, the argument that the free market and competition does not hold true because almost every one of these institutions are supported by government money in one form or the other, i.e. direct support, tuition support, bonding support, etc....The college market simply cannot support an infinite number of choices because it is just too costly. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So, I believe a better system would involve some &quot;planning&quot;, to sound like a communist. For example, in the above list of state supported schools, perhaps the University of Minnesota and St. Cloud St. University would both have economic degrees, with the Univ of Minnesota (the biggest campus in the state and amongst the largest in the nation) and Winona St. would offer a political science degree. You can still choose to get your political science degree at a large university like the U of Mn, or a smaller state university like Winona St. You just cannot get every choice offered to you. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;BY eliminating degree programs the schools can reduce the costly level of overhead that is associated with such programs, i.e tenured professors, departmental administrative staff, and frankly, an overly emphasized research arm.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have long been a proponent of even more focus that what is described here. Why does every major college institution offer such a wide array of degree choices? That is just plain ridiculous and not cost efficient. I understand that in some ways colleges and universities &#8220;specialize&#8221; in certain subjects. </p>
<p>Why does the University of Minnesota, the University of Minnesota-Duluth,  St. Cloud St., and WInona St (to use college and universities in my local and just to name a few) all offer the exact same types of degrees (rhetorical)?</p>
<p>The fact is that our post-secondary education system has become a bureacratic system of turf protection and funding wars. THe concern for the taxpayer that supports these schools, parents that pay tuition, and students that get educations at the institutions has seemingly evaporated.</p>
<p>Further, the argument that the free market and competition does not hold true because almost every one of these institutions are supported by government money in one form or the other, i.e. direct support, tuition support, bonding support, etc&#8230;.The college market simply cannot support an infinite number of choices because it is just too costly. </p>
<p>So, I believe a better system would involve some &#8220;planning&#8221;, to sound like a communist. For example, in the above list of state supported schools, perhaps the University of Minnesota and St. Cloud St. University would both have economic degrees, with the Univ of Minnesota (the biggest campus in the state and amongst the largest in the nation) and Winona St. would offer a political science degree. You can still choose to get your political science degree at a large university like the U of Mn, or a smaller state university like Winona St. You just cannot get every choice offered to you. </p>
<p>BY eliminating degree programs the schools can reduce the costly level of overhead that is associated with such programs, i.e tenured professors, departmental administrative staff, and frankly, an overly emphasized research arm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stan</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2008/05/the-power-of-in.html/comment-page-1#comment-11284</link>
		<dc:creator>stan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 13:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2008/05/the-power-of-in.html #comment-11284</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m a Davidson College grad.  Focus is everything.  Davidson&#039;s focus is all about undergraduate liberal arts education in a commumity governed by an honor code.  Nothing else.  For an outsider&#039;s perspective read this -- http://cronkite.asu.edu/mcguireblog/?p=71 by a professor at Az St journalism school.  Read it all, but this gives a flavor: &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I remain enthralled by  the impact the honor code had on the campus, students and faculty. The pledge to live by the code radically changes the culture. I saw countless examples of how the honor code positively affected the campus. As I wrote in that 2003 column: “Young people were proud of doing the right thing. Students worried about whether the mildest form of consultation was approved conduct. Their conscience was honed to a fine edge. It was exciting for a stranger to see how much the honor code shaped student behavior. To my visiting eye, integrity practically oozed out of the place. “&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As The Wildcats ran their disciplined offensive sets with complicated screens, and when they bottled up Wisconsin and Kansas with their well-schooled defense, I saluted Davidson’s talented coach Bob McKillop. I also knew the culture of Davidson College contributed to the team’s success in a very big way. McKillop does things the right way, and so does Davidson the school.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s all about the focus.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a Davidson College grad.  Focus is everything.  Davidson&#8217;s focus is all about undergraduate liberal arts education in a commumity governed by an honor code.  Nothing else.  For an outsider&#8217;s perspective read this &#8212; <a href="http://cronkite.asu.edu/mcguireblog/?p=71" rel="nofollow">http://cronkite.asu.edu/mcguireblog/?p=71</a> by a professor at Az St journalism school.  Read it all, but this gives a flavor: </p>
<p>I remain enthralled by  the impact the honor code had on the campus, students and faculty. The pledge to live by the code radically changes the culture. I saw countless examples of how the honor code positively affected the campus. As I wrote in that 2003 column: “Young people were proud of doing the right thing. Students worried about whether the mildest form of consultation was approved conduct. Their conscience was honed to a fine edge. It was exciting for a stranger to see how much the honor code shaped student behavior. To my visiting eye, integrity practically oozed out of the place. “</p>
<p>As The Wildcats ran their disciplined offensive sets with complicated screens, and when they bottled up Wisconsin and Kansas with their well-schooled defense, I saluted Davidson’s talented coach Bob McKillop. I also knew the culture of Davidson College contributed to the team’s success in a very big way. McKillop does things the right way, and so does Davidson the school.</p>
</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all about the focus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trumwill</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2008/05/the-power-of-in.html/comment-page-1#comment-11283</link>
		<dc:creator>trumwill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 17:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2008/05/the-power-of-in.html #comment-11283</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;The same could be said for college football. I work for George Washington Univ and used to work for George Mason Univ, neither of which have a varsity football program. Why not? College football is a huge cash cow, what with TV deals, bowl games, tickets, fan wear, stadium rentals for Rolling Stones concerts, and hot dog sales.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Most football programs lose money. The reason that most universities do it is for prestige rather than money. If GMU or GWU could get into the Big East or another BCS conference they might be able to make money, but otherwise they&#039;d come out in the red. Which is not to say that it would necessarily be a bad idea to do it anyway. I probably wouldn&#039;t have gone to the school I went to if they didn&#039;t field a football team and GMU in particular can attest to what an athletics program can bring in as far as applicants because of their success in basketball.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The same could be said for college football. I work for George Washington Univ and used to work for George Mason Univ, neither of which have a varsity football program. Why not? College football is a huge cash cow, what with TV deals, bowl games, tickets, fan wear, stadium rentals for Rolling Stones concerts, and hot dog sales.</i></p>
<p>Most football programs lose money. The reason that most universities do it is for prestige rather than money. If GMU or GWU could get into the Big East or another BCS conference they might be able to make money, but otherwise they&#8217;d come out in the red. Which is not to say that it would necessarily be a bad idea to do it anyway. I probably wouldn&#8217;t have gone to the school I went to if they didn&#8217;t field a football team and GMU in particular can attest to what an athletics program can bring in as far as applicants because of their success in basketball.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dearieme</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2008/05/the-power-of-in.html/comment-page-1#comment-11282</link>
		<dc:creator>dearieme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2008/05/the-power-of-in.html #comment-11282</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;A Law School would lower the tone so.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Law School would lower the tone so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2008/05/the-power-of-in.html/comment-page-1#comment-11281</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 19:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2008/05/the-power-of-in.html #comment-11281</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The question is just what significant improvement to undergraduate education is being hampered by a lack of money. It seems likely that almost all useful ideas are already being pursued, and that it is new ideas that are in scarce supply, not the funding to pursue them. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Regards, Don&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is just what significant improvement to undergraduate education is being hampered by a lack of money. It seems likely that almost all useful ideas are already being pursued, and that it is new ideas that are in scarce supply, not the funding to pursue them. </p>
<p>Regards, Don</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2008/05/the-power-of-in.html/comment-page-1#comment-11280</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 18:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2008/05/the-power-of-in.html #comment-11280</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The same could be said for college football.  I work for George Washington Univ and used to work for George Mason Univ, neither of which have a varsity football program.  Why not?  College football is a huge cash cow, what with TV deals, bowl games, tickets, fan wear, stadium rentals for Rolling Stones concerts, and hot dog sales.  Both universities made a considered decision to not have a football program so they could focus more on academics and research (and basketball teams) instead.  Does this country really need more football players and lawyers?  Just because you can make something doesn&#039;t mean you should.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same could be said for college football.  I work for George Washington Univ and used to work for George Mason Univ, neither of which have a varsity football program.  Why not?  College football is a huge cash cow, what with TV deals, bowl games, tickets, fan wear, stadium rentals for Rolling Stones concerts, and hot dog sales.  Both universities made a considered decision to not have a football program so they could focus more on academics and research (and basketball teams) instead.  Does this country really need more football players and lawyers?  Just because you can make something doesn&#8217;t mean you should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NASCAR Wife</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2008/05/the-power-of-in.html/comment-page-1#comment-11279</link>
		<dc:creator>NASCAR Wife</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 18:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2008/05/the-power-of-in.html #comment-11279</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Do we really need more law schools in this country?  We alredy graduate 40,000+ lawyers a year.  We would probably do a lot better as a country if we had fewer lawyers and more engineers and scientists.  Plus lawyers are generally leeches on society.  They do not generate wealth, they use the law to move it from productive entities to themselves and other unproductive entities.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do we really need more law schools in this country?  We alredy graduate 40,000+ lawyers a year.  We would probably do a lot better as a country if we had fewer lawyers and more engineers and scientists.  Plus lawyers are generally leeches on society.  They do not generate wealth, they use the law to move it from productive entities to themselves and other unproductive entities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
