<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Subsidizing Real Estate Developers Ruled to be Clearly in the Public Interest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2008/05/subsidizing-rea.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2008/05/subsidizing-rea.html</link>
	<description>Dispatches from a Small Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 04:16:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MJ</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2008/05/subsidizing-rea.html/comment-page-1#comment-11009</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 09:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2008/05/subsidizing-rea.html #comment-11009</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It is doubtful that the mall development will increase output in the region by even the 1 percent or so that the developers claim.  Since retail must serve an existing population and, by default, households face budget constraints, it is unlikely that this mall will generate &lt;i&gt;any&lt;/i&gt; new net activity.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, the Mall of America in the Twin Cities does not understand this and neither does the MN legislature, which is why they are paving the way for a much larger subsidy ($379 million) for that mall&#039;s expansion plans, including paying for a $200 parking ramp.  Without getting too much into the details, the subsidy scheme will actually force the mall&#039;s competitors in the region to finance much of this largesse.  A truly sad situation all the way around.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is doubtful that the mall development will increase output in the region by even the 1 percent or so that the developers claim.  Since retail must serve an existing population and, by default, households face budget constraints, it is unlikely that this mall will generate <i>any</i> new net activity.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the Mall of America in the Twin Cities does not understand this and neither does the MN legislature, which is why they are paving the way for a much larger subsidy ($379 million) for that mall&#8217;s expansion plans, including paying for a $200 parking ramp.  Without getting too much into the details, the subsidy scheme will actually force the mall&#8217;s competitors in the region to finance much of this largesse.  A truly sad situation all the way around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2008/05/subsidizing-rea.html/comment-page-1#comment-11008</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 03:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2008/05/subsidizing-rea.html #comment-11008</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Don&#039;t you mean LESS credulous?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t you mean LESS credulous?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
