Comments on: Legislation for the Benefit of One http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2008/05/legislation-for.html Dispatches from a Small Business Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:13:09 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: M. Hodak http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2008/05/legislation-for.html/comment-page-1#comment-11278 M. Hodak Fri, 16 May 2008 02:41:20 +0000 http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2008/05/legislation-for.html #comment-11278 <p>The rest of the story would be, I guarantee, quite interesting:</p> <p>Which representatives sponsored the bill and stood in support? How much did they get from Plum Creek? It's all legal, I'm sure, but to quote Bob Dole's famous plaint, "Where's the outrage?"</p> The rest of the story would be, I guarantee, quite interesting:

Which representatives sponsored the bill and stood in support? How much did they get from Plum Creek? It’s all legal, I’m sure, but to quote Bob Dole’s famous plaint, “Where’s the outrage?”

]]> By: Dan http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2008/05/legislation-for.html/comment-page-1#comment-11277 Dan Thu, 15 May 2008 17:39:42 +0000 http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2008/05/legislation-for.html #comment-11277 <p>Yeah, I saw that one coming a mile away. 40,000 acres of forest with a "native fish habitat conservation plan approved by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service," adjacent to a National Forest? With land holdings like that, there just had to be a railroad involved.</p> Yeah, I saw that one coming a mile away. 40,000 acres of forest with a “native fish habitat conservation plan approved by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service,” adjacent to a National Forest? With land holdings like that, there just had to be a railroad involved.

]]>