<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Christmas Tree Recycling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/12/christmas-tree.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/12/christmas-tree.html</link>
	<description>Dispatches from a Small Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Rohlfs</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/12/christmas-tree.html/comment-page-1#comment-8808</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Rohlfs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 02:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/12/christmas-tree.html#comment-8808</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The City programs to convert old Christmas trees to mulch is meant to keep clean organic matter out of the landfills, so for that it is working. The secondary benefits of mulch are more about water conservation than carbon sequestration, so mulch is good in its own right.  Growing the trees takes about 7 years, so that probably cycles more carbon than growing annual crops on the same land, to say nothing of less erosion from plowing. So I figure the real Christmas tree thing is OK, certainly better than fake.  Who needs one more fake thing in their life? &lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The City programs to convert old Christmas trees to mulch is meant to keep clean organic matter out of the landfills, so for that it is working. The secondary benefits of mulch are more about water conservation than carbon sequestration, so mulch is good in its own right.  Growing the trees takes about 7 years, so that probably cycles more carbon than growing annual crops on the same land, to say nothing of less erosion from plowing. So I figure the real Christmas tree thing is OK, certainly better than fake.  Who needs one more fake thing in their life? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: avfuktare vind och krypgrund</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/12/christmas-tree.html/comment-page-1#comment-8807</link>
		<dc:creator>avfuktare vind och krypgrund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 09:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/12/christmas-tree.html#comment-8807</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There is a company I read about that developed a technology to harvest trees on the bottom of hydro-power reservoirs. As the water reservoir was filled the forrest was drenched and apparently after a half or full century is still perfectly good. Enough moist and a lack of oxygene preserves the wood. It doesn&#039;t even rot nor mould. &lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a company I read about that developed a technology to harvest trees on the bottom of hydro-power reservoirs. As the water reservoir was filled the forrest was drenched and apparently after a half or full century is still perfectly good. Enough moist and a lack of oxygene preserves the wood. It doesn&#8217;t even rot nor mould. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefirefire</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/12/christmas-tree.html/comment-page-1#comment-8806</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefirefire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 19:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/12/christmas-tree.html#comment-8806</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I get rid of my old Christmas tree the good old fashioned way....I take it out back of the hay shed and lay it on the ground with all the garbage that has piled up during the holiday season and I burn it along with the horrible tie my aunt gives me,the terrible smelling after shave and cologne set makes an excellent accellerent! Support global warming..it&#039;s too durn cold outside!!!&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get rid of my old Christmas tree the good old fashioned way&#8230;.I take it out back of the hay shed and lay it on the ground with all the garbage that has piled up during the holiday season and I burn it along with the horrible tie my aunt gives me,the terrible smelling after shave and cologne set makes an excellent accellerent! Support global warming..it&#8217;s too durn cold outside!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/12/christmas-tree.html/comment-page-1#comment-8805</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 15:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/12/christmas-tree.html#comment-8805</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;We bundle our Holiday trees up and sink them in a local lake for fish habitats.  They have been doing this for at least 20 years and I still haven&#039;t caught a fish anywhere near these so-called habitats.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We bundle our Holiday trees up and sink them in a local lake for fish habitats.  They have been doing this for at least 20 years and I still haven&#8217;t caught a fish anywhere near these so-called habitats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/12/christmas-tree.html/comment-page-1#comment-8804</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 09:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/12/christmas-tree.html#comment-8804</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is a good point, Coyote. If you are not going to sequester the trees, then perhaps then they should be burned in a power plant of some sort so that at least you can harvest the energy from the oxidation process. Also with the landfills it would seem like you would want to capture the methane and then run it through a power plant so that you end up with CO2 gas and some energy instead of CH4 in the upper atmosphere. Same with cow shit. Instead of bitching about cows and methane, capture it and use it to displace some oil consumption so we aren&#039;t so beholding to all these tin-pot dictators (or we preserve the oil for pharmacuetical feed stock).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s why cellulose derived ethanol seems like an attractive energy source since it uses corn waste products that would eventually biodegrade and release their stored CO2. Cellulose derived corn stock ethanol would complement food production rather than compete with it which as you have pointed out in previous posts is a really stupid idea, especially when you consider that non-cellusose derived corn ethanol is at best only slightly energy positive. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ivan&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good point, Coyote. If you are not going to sequester the trees, then perhaps then they should be burned in a power plant of some sort so that at least you can harvest the energy from the oxidation process. Also with the landfills it would seem like you would want to capture the methane and then run it through a power plant so that you end up with CO2 gas and some energy instead of CH4 in the upper atmosphere. Same with cow shit. Instead of bitching about cows and methane, capture it and use it to displace some oil consumption so we aren&#8217;t so beholding to all these tin-pot dictators (or we preserve the oil for pharmacuetical feed stock).</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why cellulose derived ethanol seems like an attractive energy source since it uses corn waste products that would eventually biodegrade and release their stored CO2. Cellulose derived corn stock ethanol would complement food production rather than compete with it which as you have pointed out in previous posts is a really stupid idea, especially when you consider that non-cellusose derived corn ethanol is at best only slightly energy positive. </p>
<p>Ivan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/12/christmas-tree.html/comment-page-1#comment-8803</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 20:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/12/christmas-tree.html#comment-8803</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I like the tradition of Epiphany and Burning of the Greens.  Bring your tree down to the parish church, chuck &#039;em in a pile.  On January 6 you put &#039;em all to the torch.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My home town, Tulsa, does it really really right - every year over 5,000 of the things are torched on the 6h - it&#039;s a very memorable sight.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the tradition of Epiphany and Burning of the Greens.  Bring your tree down to the parish church, chuck &#8216;em in a pile.  On January 6 you put &#8216;em all to the torch.</p>
<p>My home town, Tulsa, does it really really right &#8211; every year over 5,000 of the things are torched on the 6h &#8211; it&#8217;s a very memorable sight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob (another Rob)</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/12/christmas-tree.html/comment-page-1#comment-8802</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob (another Rob)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/12/christmas-tree.html#comment-8802</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;While we are at, the earth has an infection.  It has too much oil in it and that oil must be drained, stored safely and either stabilized as plastic or incinerated in automobile engines.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;/Sarcasm off&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While we are at, the earth has an infection.  It has too much oil in it and that oil must be drained, stored safely and either stabilized as plastic or incinerated in automobile engines.</p>
<p>/Sarcasm off</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bearster</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/12/christmas-tree.html/comment-page-1#comment-8801</link>
		<dc:creator>Bearster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/12/christmas-tree.html#comment-8801</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Quick, make as much non-biodegradable, non-recyclable plastic as possible!&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quick, make as much non-biodegradable, non-recyclable plastic as possible!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stirner</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/12/christmas-tree.html/comment-page-1#comment-8800</link>
		<dc:creator>stirner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/12/christmas-tree.html#comment-8800</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The same thing applies to the paper and cardboard that gets recycled. It&#039;s made of carbon - bury it deep! Perish the thought they have to plant more trees for pulp production.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s rather ironic because when environmentalists complain about the &quot;full&quot; landfills, they will often trot out the example of the 50 year old buried newspaper that has been dug up and is still readable. Hmm, sounds like long term sequestration to me.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same thing applies to the paper and cardboard that gets recycled. It&#8217;s made of carbon &#8211; bury it deep! Perish the thought they have to plant more trees for pulp production.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s rather ironic because when environmentalists complain about the &#8220;full&#8221; landfills, they will often trot out the example of the 50 year old buried newspaper that has been dug up and is still readable. Hmm, sounds like long term sequestration to me.</p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

