Comments on: New Unified Field Theory http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/11/new-unified-fie.html Dispatches from a Small Business Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:39:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Macquechoux http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/11/new-unified-fie.html/comment-page-1#comment-8429 Macquechoux Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:47:02 +0000 http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/11/new-unified-fie.html#comment-8429 <p>Mr. Coyote, I recently ran across this:</p> <p>http://initforthegold.blogspot.com/2008/05/falsifiability-question.html</p> <p>Leland, a frequent contributor to The Oil Drum and staunch believer in man made global warming made the following comment. </p> <p>"It's written by someone working in the climate science field. (He's apparently at tu, but I'll try not to hold it against him. ;-) It's a short and interesting piece about why AGW is not really a theory, and what evidence it would take to make him change his mind about it.</p> <p>Unfortunately, I fear the average denialist just wouldn't understand it."</p> <p>I've always admired your critical thinking ability coupled with your skills in analysis and logic and would appreciate for you at your leisure to analyze the climate scientist's statement. I believe it would make a good cross post over at the Climate Skeptic.</p> <p>Side bar:</p> <p>Leland, in my opinion, is like many true believers. He tends to see global warming as an either black or white issue; there are no shades of gray. Not only is global warming it is caused by man. Period and amen.</p> Mr. Coyote, I recently ran across this:

http://initforthegold.blogspot.com/2008/05/falsifiability-question.html

Leland, a frequent contributor to The Oil Drum and staunch believer in man made global warming made the following comment.

“It’s written by someone working in the climate science field. (He’s apparently at tu, but I’ll try not to hold it against him. ;-) It’s a short and interesting piece about why AGW is not really a theory, and what evidence it would take to make him change his mind about it.

Unfortunately, I fear the average denialist just wouldn’t understand it.”

I’ve always admired your critical thinking ability coupled with your skills in analysis and logic and would appreciate for you at your leisure to analyze the climate scientist’s statement. I believe it would make a good cross post over at the Climate Skeptic.

Side bar:

Leland, in my opinion, is like many true believers. He tends to see global warming as an either black or white issue; there are no shades of gray. Not only is global warming it is caused by man. Period and amen.

]]> By: Mesa Econoguy http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/11/new-unified-fie.html/comment-page-1#comment-8428 Mesa Econoguy Fri, 30 Nov 2007 01:59:24 +0000 http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/11/new-unified-fie.html#comment-8428 <p>42</p> 42

]]> By: tim http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/11/new-unified-fie.html/comment-page-1#comment-8427 tim Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:44:13 +0000 http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/11/new-unified-fie.html#comment-8427 <p>Echochondriac - just like a hypochondriac only about the environment.</p> Echochondriac – just like a hypochondriac only about the environment.

]]> By: David B http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/11/new-unified-fie.html/comment-page-1#comment-8426 David B Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:46:57 +0000 http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/11/new-unified-fie.html#comment-8426 <p>To be fair, a couple of those look like good effects: if Germany becomes a better wine producer, that could be a good thing...</p> <p>But yeah, I'm with you.</p> To be fair, a couple of those look like good effects: if Germany becomes a better wine producer, that could be a good thing…

But yeah, I’m with you.

]]>