<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Too Many Insured</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/09/too-many-insure.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/09/too-many-insure.html</link>
	<description>Dispatches from a Small Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:39:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale Bradshaw</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/09/too-many-insure.html/comment-page-1#comment-7359</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale Bradshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 18:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/09/too-many-insure.html#comment-7359</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Possibly, but if you do a long term comparison between something like Vanguard Health Care and Vanguard Total Stock Market Fund http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AVGHCX you don&#039;t get significant out performance in the health care sector. It could be that it&#039;s just  a productivity sink with no incentive to give value to share holders, but it seems like at some point money moving towards a more productive sector or asset allocation would make that untenable.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Possibly, but if you do a long term comparison between something like Vanguard Health Care and Vanguard Total Stock Market Fund <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AVGHCX" rel="nofollow">http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AVGHCX</a> you don&#8217;t get significant out performance in the health care sector. It could be that it&#8217;s just  a productivity sink with no incentive to give value to share holders, but it seems like at some point money moving towards a more productive sector or asset allocation would make that untenable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

