Comments on: Storm Frequency http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/08/storm-frequency.html Dispatches from a Small Business Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:42:23 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Edward http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/08/storm-frequency.html/comment-page-1#comment-6467 Edward Wed, 08 Oct 2008 05:43:50 +0000 http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/08/storm-frequency.html #comment-6467 <p>It is unfortunate that the filmmakers didn't correct all of the issues with the Great Global Warming Swindle for it's DVD release.. It would have made a big difference. The film does raise many important points nonetheless.</p> <p>With the amount of dishonesty, corruption and waste associated with global warming legislation, as well as the relatively weak evidence associated with man-made global warming, being "better safe than sorry" really should be choosing the side of the skeptics..</p> It is unfortunate that the filmmakers didn’t correct all of the issues with the Great Global Warming Swindle for it’s DVD release.. It would have made a big difference. The film does raise many important points nonetheless.

With the amount of dishonesty, corruption and waste associated with global warming legislation, as well as the relatively weak evidence associated with man-made global warming, being “better safe than sorry” really should be choosing the side of the skeptics..

]]> By: Adam http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/08/storm-frequency.html/comment-page-1#comment-6466 Adam Tue, 01 Apr 2008 17:20:48 +0000 http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/08/storm-frequency.html #comment-6466 <p>I'll agree that detection technology has improved over the past 150 years but to say Al Gore is completely wrong is as foolish as to claim he's completely right.</p> <p>In the UK, another documentary was made titled "The Great Global Warming Swindel", which made a case for the skeptics. Some saw it as balancing the argument while others thought it was obvious misinformation. The day after it aired on national TV, several of the scientists quoted in the film, came on the radio saying that what they had said had been taken completely out of context.</p> <p>Even if the climate isn't changing as a result of man-made global warming to the extent that some people are claiming it is, isn't it better to be safe than sorry?</p> I’ll agree that detection technology has improved over the past 150 years but to say Al Gore is completely wrong is as foolish as to claim he’s completely right.

In the UK, another documentary was made titled “The Great Global Warming Swindel”, which made a case for the skeptics. Some saw it as balancing the argument while others thought it was obvious misinformation. The day after it aired on national TV, several of the scientists quoted in the film, came on the radio saying that what they had said had been taken completely out of context.

Even if the climate isn’t changing as a result of man-made global warming to the extent that some people are claiming it is, isn’t it better to be safe than sorry?

]]> By: Adam http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/08/storm-frequency.html/comment-page-1#comment-6465 Adam Tue, 01 Apr 2008 17:19:38 +0000 http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/08/storm-frequency.html #comment-6465 <p>I'll agree that detection technology has improved over the past 150 years but to say Al Gore is completely wrong is as foolish as to claim he's completely right.</p> <p>In the UK, another documentary was made titled "The Great Global Warming Swindel", which made a case for the skeptics. Some saw it as balancing the argument while others thought it was obvious misinformation. The day after it aired on national TV, several of the scientists quoted in the film, came on the radio saying that what they had said had been taken completely out of context.</p> <p>Even if the climate isn't changing as a result of man-made global warming to the extent that some people are claiming it is, isn't it better to be safe than sorry?</p> I’ll agree that detection technology has improved over the past 150 years but to say Al Gore is completely wrong is as foolish as to claim he’s completely right.

In the UK, another documentary was made titled “The Great Global Warming Swindel”, which made a case for the skeptics. Some saw it as balancing the argument while others thought it was obvious misinformation. The day after it aired on national TV, several of the scientists quoted in the film, came on the radio saying that what they had said had been taken completely out of context.

Even if the climate isn’t changing as a result of man-made global warming to the extent that some people are claiming it is, isn’t it better to be safe than sorry?

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/08/storm-frequency.html/comment-page-1#comment-6464 Anonymous Wed, 31 Oct 2007 20:14:13 +0000 http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/08/storm-frequency.html #comment-6464 <p>this is unreliable data go ask your matriarch for better info</p> this is unreliable data go ask your matriarch for better info

]]> By: Steve http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/08/storm-frequency.html/comment-page-1#comment-6463 Steve Mon, 13 Aug 2007 04:56:09 +0000 http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/08/storm-frequency.html #comment-6463 <p>I have been bothered by Newsweek ever since the Martha Stewart cover they did, with her head on a model's body. Thanks for these posts, they are good reading.</p> I have been bothered by Newsweek ever since the Martha Stewart cover they did, with her head on a model’s body. Thanks for these posts, they are good reading.

]]>