Last week, I pointed out that my alma mater Princeton had again topped the USN&WR college rankings. But those college rankings were for those who wanted to invest their tuition money and four years of their life at the school that would, you know, educate them the best.
If, however, you would rather choose a college based on how well it serves everyone else's interests rather than your own, you can use this ranking from Washington Monthly, presumably chosen with help from special correspondent Ellsworth Toohey. Universities are chosen for social contribution and research and number of Peace Corps volunteers and the like. No indicators of educational quality or student satisfaction are used. Really, they don't seem to be joking:
U.S. News & World Report publishes its university rankings
every year, and every year people complain about them. So starting in
2005 we decided to do more than just complain, and instead came out
with our own rankings "” based not on reputation or endowment size, but
rather on how much of a contribution each university actually makes to
Top universities on the list presumably teach important skills like:
- How to find a job that helps lots of people but doesn't pay very much and provides no job satisfaction
- How to find a boyfriend who beats you a lot and never can hold a job, but needs your financial support really badly
- How to invest in companies with no prospects but who need the money very much (taught presumably by Eugene Lawson)
In this list, a Peace Corps volunteer is ranked to have made a larger contribution to America than say: Jimmy Stewart, Meg Whitman, Jeff Bezos, James Madison, etc. (Oh, and Pete Conrad, probably my personal favorite Princeton Grad, and first man on the moon after Neil Armstrong's dress rehearsal on a Hollywood soundstage with Buzz Aldrin and OJ Simpson.)
This is maybe a great list if you have a billion dollars burning a hole in your pocket and want to find a university to endow, but of what utility is this for prospective students?
Postscript: You do, though, have to give Washington Monthly props for putting Texas A&M at the top of their list, a university whose student body is probably least likely of almost any major state school to purchase very many copies of their magazine [a comment on their political orientation, not their ability to read].