http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_variation

Any comment?

There is no noticible trend.

This is telling evidence of the CO2 “greenhouse” being over-evaluated.

Enjoy!

http://junkscience.com/blog_js/2008/01/12/processing-33-years-of-ir-longwave-data/

It is not. There is a right answer and a wrong answer. I am a scientist, and I apologize in advance for seeming arrogant.

A clear understanding of climate change is hard to come by. You can read all the books at Borders that you want, but you will not be presented scientific evidence so much as opinion. It’s possible to obtain knowledge with which to determine for yourself whether a study that is presented to you is convincing or not. This process takes years of study, and generally, one will be qualified to become an engineer or a scientist before this is accomplished.

I.E. please get an advanced degree in a scientific discipline that is related to this subject before becoming vocal about it. The water is far too muddy. The most basic step to thinking rationally and scientifically is to withhold judgement of the truth until you see proof. This is what we go through 20 or 23 years of school to learn how to do. It’s OK to not have an opinion. It’s OK to ignore even engineers or PhD’s of intermediate renown. When information is accurate, it will eventually be reiterated by scientists who have established a lifetime’s track record. Case in point: listen to the IPCC. Don’t listen to this fellow. He is decades too inexperienced to challenge the scientific establishment.

That being said, the highest authority in the scientific establishment concerning global climate change is probably the IPCC. Such a large body of internationally famous scientists work for them that they are more likely to have the correct assessment than anyone else. Their assessment is that climate change is man-made, semi-reversible, extremely dangerous, and requires immediate committment to reduce the damage that it has begun and will continue to cause.

“The cumulative effect of all adjustments is approximately a one-half degree Fahrenheit warming in the annual time series over a 50-year period from the 1940′s until the last decade of the century.”

I’m glad I found this error myself rather than suffer the other side pointing it out to me with the obvious, “See, he’s exaggerating!”

try manage your wealth..
http://www.bwm-financial.com

Abstract: Acquiring a first stage control over our Planetary Weather Systems.

The purpose of this paper is to present evidence of a recently discovered reoccurring oceanic phenomena that is expected to provide a possible explanation for the volumetric heating effects being observed in our planets ocean’s and then present a set of preliminary specifications for a series of physical constructs that are well within our current technology to build and put into place as the means for combating this phenomena and its expected effects on or planet. Currently this oceanic phenomena has not yet received wide recognition in Scientific circles as the possible “cause-and-effect” being described euphemistically, as “Planetary Warming”.

Introduction:

I am a 63 year old Electronics and Computer Engineer, Amateur Scientist and Systems Analysis. I am Co-Inventor in two U.S. Patents. Published Author. Member, IEEE’s Power Engineering and Oceanic Engineering Societies. Co-Author in two IEEE Publications. I am a Retired 20+ year Veteran of the US Armed Forces.

Beginning sometime in early 1996, I became aware of discussions in Scientific circles about a subject being euphemistically referred to at that time as “Planetary Warming”. This “Planetary Warming” aroused my interest. I have subsequently acquired over the years, as time and money permitted, numerous published Scientific Papers, US Government and International (IPCC) Public documents and Private Research Organizations that had funded Research Projects for individual Scientists and Scientific Organizations, into the causes of “Planetary Warming”.

Interested readers can access the National Geographic News article: “Global Warming Fast Facts” on the Global Internet at:

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/12/1206_041206_global_warming.html

Updated June 14, 2007 and get a wide view of the “Fast Facts” as they are, allegedly, known today.

The above Global Internet article demonstrates the vast repertoire of published documents and information which has become available for study and analysis. Numerous History Channel, Learning Channel, Science Channel and Public Broadcasting Network Documentaries have presented a collage of thoughts and opinions about the causes and recommended “corrective” actions. Readers should see: http://www.climate-skeptic.com for a far more detailed analysis into the current “disagreements” with various Scientists and their supporting organizations and individuals who have prepared and presented opinions on the causes of Planetary Warming in the many and diverse public forums.

It is not my intent in this Paper to engage in useless commentaries about the pros or cons of “Planetary Warming”, “Climate Sensitivity” or “Empirical conclusions” and the vast repertoire of “truths, half truths and alleged prevarications”.

I will only provide these indisputable facts:
1. “Sudden climate change is an established scientific reality.”
2. “Over the last 2.8 million years, climate shifts have happened many times.”
3. “Studies of the Greenland and Antarctic ice cores show conclusively that abrupt climate change over the last 2.8 million years is an indisputable reality of life, given this planets current geological configuration.”
4. “The rising of the Central American land bridge 2.8 million years ago changed the fundamental organization and pattern of the Earth’s ocean currents, which combined with small variations in solar energy output and perturbations in Earth’s orbit, has led to a much less stable climate since that land bridge was pushed into its current position by the forces that continuously shift the Tectonic plates over Earth’s mantle.”
5. “A severe climate shift, should one occur as currently “predicted”, has never happened before to a civilization with six billion people, living in a planet wide civilization that absolutely depends for it existence on continued climate stability.”
6. “The United States has adopted, not with out economic justification, a posture of “considered” indifference, as its Public policy, considering the expected economic consequences of adopting the Kyoto accords and its severe economic impact on the lives of many Americans.

Understanding the Origins of the Oceanic Thermal phenomena

My interests as an Amateur Scientist and Systems Analysis in the subject of “Planetary Warming”, and its causes, covers many of the Natural Sciences that includes, but is NOT limited to:

Basic Astronomy
Our Solar Systems Planetary motions
Planetary Gravity interactions
The Solar “wind”
Planetary Atmospheric Physics
Oceanic and Atmospheric Interactions
Origins and types of “Green House” gasses
Planetary thermal conveyer and convection systems
The Atlantic Thermal Conveyer System
El-Nino and La-Nina’s Planetary weather interactions

I am by no means an “Expert” in any of the above Natural Sciences.

What I AM, can be best described as an Engineer/Amateur Scientist/Systems Analysis, examining pieces of an enormous “puzzle”. When I come across a piece-of-the-puzzle that is left dangling out there “inside the box” stating that this, or that, conclusion or supposition, has been arrived at by the Scientific Community, either with an “unknown’ or “inconclusive” result, I endeavor to take an action that can best be described as a Detective, searching for “clues” to a “mystery”.

Just as there is the “Law-of-Nature”, “Law-of-Proximity”, “Law-of-Reciprocity”, “Law-of-Reciprocal Proportions, and others, I use the “Law-of-Simplicity” embodying the concepts in Occam’s Razor and the “Law of Pharsimony” (i.e.: when alternate or multiple explanations exist, the simplest is usually correct), in examining all aspects of these “clues”. to arrive at the simplest explanation.

Assembling a picture of the entire Scientific “puzzle” called “Planetary Warming” has taken approximately eleven years to put together. Thus far, I am confident that I have a good “view” of the problem as demonstrated in my assembled “picture puzzle”. From this assembled “picture puzzle”, I have spent the last year and a half studying possible “high level” and “low level” solutions to this problem of “Planetary Warming”.

Only recently have I discovered the oceanic thermal phenomena described above. It is resident in the Archives of the Oceanic Engineering Society o the IEEE.

The Oceanic thermal phenomena: Magna Domes

The planet Earth is being heated INTERNALLY by the absorption of the vast electromagnetic energies of the Solar Wind. It is estimated that over the last several thousand years, sufficient high electron flow rates INTO the core of our planet has raised the internal operating temperature of our planetary cores electrically equivalent “brushless saturable core amplidyne motor”. This for want of a better word, “motor/engine”, is what essentially “drives” this planets 24 hour daily rotation. Added to our planets internal electro-magnetic drive motors physical action is the counter-electromagnetic field generated by our planets falling through the suns own electromagnetic field, causing our planets circumnavigation rate-of-motion about the sun to be slowed BY the suns induced counter-electromagnetic field, via negative feedback. Otherwise, our planet would be spun either into a decaying orbit or spun further out into space creating a vast elliptical orbit, instead of the near circular stable orbit that is now enjoys.

Just as any human mechanical apparatus designed with an inadequate cooling system will eventually break down, so our own planets internal electro-magnetic drive motor is starting to break down. This is becoming increasingly evident by the slow reduction in the planets electromagnetic fields intensity over the last 55-60 years and the appearance of south pole magnetic anomalies appearing north of the equator and north pole magnetic anomalies appearing south of the equator. In any magnetic material currently known, as that magnetic material heats up, its ability to “hold” it magnetic characteristics decreases with the rise of the magnetic materials internal temperature. This destabilization of our planetary cores electro-magnetic, “motor/engine”, may also be the cause of an observed increase in the frequency of small earthquakes along the boundaries of the Tectonic plates.

The increasing temperature of our planets internal mantle is causing it to expand, pressing the mantel OUTWARD, toward the surface of the planet. We see this as an increase in the number of pockets of magma pressing up against the tremendous ocean pressures on the bottom of the ocean floors in what are called “magna domes”. There are more frequent occurrences of these magma domes “bursting” and creating mega plume “events”. Only recently has a very LARGE magma dome been discovered at the bottom of the Indian Ocean. It has been thermally imaged as having a diameter of forty-three (43) miles!

Note: the currently plotted Atlantic Conveyer “river” that distributes the heat from the Pacific Ocean via a TOPSIDE flow, sub-ducts near the Greenland/NewFoundland/Grandbanks area in the North Atlantic and then RETURNS to the Pacific Ocean by BOTTOMSIDE flow, passes near and OVER part of this enormous magna dome.

Oceanic Scientists believe that there are MANY more magma domes scattered across the ocean floors. Exactly where and how large these magma domes may be is unknown!

Our technology is only now making us aware of these extraordinary phenomena’s. Only now is there becoming an awareness in the Oceanic Engineering Society and Scientific Community that these magma domes MAY be the actual cause of out oceans rising temperatures! Clearly, instabilities are appearing!

The rest of this paper describes two solutions to this, as yet, minor problem and includes extensive drawings and photographs which cannot be displayed in this blogs limited format. My bibliography is approaching almost 80 entires. I estimate at least several months more to assemble the full paper. Looking forward to your “Peer’ Review comentaries.