Comments on: China Continues to Subsidize Lower Prices for Consumers http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/06/china_continues.html Dispatches from a Small Business Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:39:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Payday Loan Advocate http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/06/china_continues.html/comment-page-1#comment-5827 Payday Loan Advocate Wed, 22 Oct 2008 08:30:47 +0000 http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/06/china_continues.html#comment-5827 <p>On Wednesday, October 14, 2008, the eyes of the world were fixed on Hempstead, New York and the third and final U.S. Presidential Debate. Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois entered the arena with an eight-point lead according to an average of national polls as compiled by CNN, and it appeared that he was content to sit on that lead. Sen. John McCain of Arizona took advantage of Obama’s laurel resting and brought the fight to him regarding the younger candidate’s policies, judgment and qualities of character. When Obama did adopt a more critical stance regarding the economic policies of the past eight years, McCain was quick to point out that he is “not President Bush.” He stated that he would enact an “across the board spending freeze,” take a hatchet to some programs and use a scalpel on the remainder once the dust settled. Obama’s stance sounded more conservative; he would “go through the federal budget page by page, line by line” in order to close programs that aren’t working as they should. Both candidates claim their economic plans will bring needed change to a broken America, but will it leave consumers with the ability to choose where and when they’ll have access to payday loans? That remains to be seen. Just because Americans see themselves as living in “the land of the free” doesn’t mean that interest groups (i.e. banks and credit unions) want them to have the freedom to choose.Post Courtesy of Personal Money StoreProfessional Blogging TeamFeed Back: 1-866-641-3406Home: http://personalmoneystore.com/NoFaxPaydayLoans.htmlBlog: http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/ </p> On Wednesday, October 14, 2008, the eyes of the world were fixed on Hempstead, New York and the third and final U.S. Presidential Debate. Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois entered the arena with an eight-point lead according to an average of national polls as compiled by CNN, and it appeared that he was content to sit on that lead. Sen. John McCain of Arizona took advantage of Obama’s laurel resting and brought the fight to him regarding the younger candidate’s policies, judgment and qualities of character. When Obama did adopt a more critical stance regarding the economic policies of the past eight years, McCain was quick to point out that he is “not President Bush.” He stated that he would enact an “across the board spending freeze,” take a hatchet to some programs and use a scalpel on the remainder once the dust settled. Obama’s stance sounded more conservative; he would “go through the federal budget page by page, line by line” in order to close programs that aren’t working as they should. Both candidates claim their economic plans will bring needed change to a broken America, but will it leave consumers with the ability to choose where and when they’ll have access to payday loans? That remains to be seen. Just because Americans see themselves as living in “the land of the free” doesn’t mean that interest groups (i.e. banks and credit unions) want them to have the freedom to choose.Post Courtesy of Personal Money StoreProfessional Blogging TeamFeed Back: 1-866-641-3406Home: http://personalmoneystore.com/NoFaxPaydayLoans.htmlBlog: http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/

]]> By: Payday Loan Advocate http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/06/china_continues.html/comment-page-1#comment-5826 Payday Loan Advocate Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:30:31 +0000 http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/06/china_continues.html#comment-5826 <p>Last Tuesday, October 7th, the second presidential debate that took place in Belmont University in Nashville attracted over 60 million viewers. Instead of coming to a more firm deliberation on how to improve the well-being of the United States and all of the American citizens who inhabit it, more questions have raised about how exactly these presidential candidates intend to better our obliterated economy. Frequent questions asked about the $700 billion Wall Street bailout were left unanswered. People are upset and even fear that it would not work and are in search of reassurance and a solution. It seems like their main focus is basically to criticize each other in hopes of rounding up a larger number of followers than the other. Their proposed intentions are based on completely irrelevant issues. Let’s take Barak Obama’s stance on payday advance lenders for an instance. He categorized them as “predatory lending”- effectively sanctioning the industry. This is not an issue that is downheartedly affecting our economy. As the real economic problems are ignored, they spend more time finding and using the pettiest affairs to add spice to the banking production.<br /> Post Courtesy of Personal Money Store<br /> Professional Blogging Team<br /> Feed Back: 1-866-641-3406<br /> Home: http://personalmoneystore.com/NoFaxPaydayLoans.html<br /> Blog: http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/<br /> </p> Last Tuesday, October 7th, the second presidential debate that took place in Belmont University in Nashville attracted over 60 million viewers. Instead of coming to a more firm deliberation on how to improve the well-being of the United States and all of the American citizens who inhabit it, more questions have raised about how exactly these presidential candidates intend to better our obliterated economy. Frequent questions asked about the $700 billion Wall Street bailout were left unanswered. People are upset and even fear that it would not work and are in search of reassurance and a solution. It seems like their main focus is basically to criticize each other in hopes of rounding up a larger number of followers than the other. Their proposed intentions are based on completely irrelevant issues. Let’s take Barak Obama’s stance on payday advance lenders for an instance. He categorized them as “predatory lending”- effectively sanctioning the industry. This is not an issue that is downheartedly affecting our economy. As the real economic problems are ignored, they spend more time finding and using the pettiest affairs to add spice to the banking production.
Post Courtesy of Personal Money Store
Professional Blogging Team
Feed Back: 1-866-641-3406
Home: http://personalmoneystore.com/NoFaxPaydayLoans.html
Blog: http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/

]]> By: W. Raymond Mills http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/06/china_continues.html/comment-page-1#comment-5825 W. Raymond Mills Tue, 08 Jul 2008 01:39:57 +0000 http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/06/china_continues.html#comment-5825 <p>Yes, U.S. economy looked great compared to Japan and Germany when finance system was allowed to run rampant. But bubbles burst. At the moment, Japan and German economy look to be in great shape while U.S. economy is in the pits.</p> <p>Germany is still frightened by the memory of the inflation that preceded Hitler. Japan is still firghtened of the stock- property bubble of 1990. <br /> Because of realistic fear, they have not allowed the fianancial sector to do as it pleases.</p> <p>Result = a solid economy. They produce products that can be sold on the international market. They are in great shape to maintain their high income status in the global economy while the U.S. is declining. Soon we will be a country near the middle of percapita income.</p> <p>The trade surplus is the reason for their current satsifactory condition and the trade deficit is the reason for U.S. problems.</p> <p>Spain once was the country that was living off the produce of other countries (due to the silver and gold taken from the Americas). Those countries supplying the produce (England and France) became powerful while Spain declined. </p> <p>A countries wealth depends upon what it can produce and sell. The U.S. is in trouble because we enjoyed spending the wealth created by previous generations and artifical financial games.</p> <p>I agree that it is not the responsibility of China to rescue the U.S. We must imitate Japan and Germany and begin to live within the means created by our productivity.</p> Yes, U.S. economy looked great compared to Japan and Germany when finance system was allowed to run rampant. But bubbles burst. At the moment, Japan and German economy look to be in great shape while U.S. economy is in the pits.

Germany is still frightened by the memory of the inflation that preceded Hitler. Japan is still firghtened of the stock- property bubble of 1990.
Because of realistic fear, they have not allowed the fianancial sector to do as it pleases.

Result = a solid economy. They produce products that can be sold on the international market. They are in great shape to maintain their high income status in the global economy while the U.S. is declining. Soon we will be a country near the middle of percapita income.

The trade surplus is the reason for their current satsifactory condition and the trade deficit is the reason for U.S. problems.

Spain once was the country that was living off the produce of other countries (due to the silver and gold taken from the Americas). Those countries supplying the produce (England and France) became powerful while Spain declined.

A countries wealth depends upon what it can produce and sell. The U.S. is in trouble because we enjoyed spending the wealth created by previous generations and artifical financial games.

I agree that it is not the responsibility of China to rescue the U.S. We must imitate Japan and Germany and begin to live within the means created by our productivity.

]]> By: EV http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/06/china_continues.html/comment-page-1#comment-5824 EV Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:27:08 +0000 http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/06/china_continues.html#comment-5824 <p>The problem with having their subsidissing exports to the US is that it makes it harder for US businesses to compete. Which translates to fewer manufacturing jobs in the US. Which means that these people that are being subsidised by the low exports are the same ones getting put out of work by them. One need only look at the rust belt to see one effect of this.</p> The problem with having their subsidissing exports to the US is that it makes it harder for US businesses to compete. Which translates to fewer manufacturing jobs in the US. Which means that these people that are being subsidised by the low exports are the same ones getting put out of work by them. One need only look at the rust belt to see one effect of this.

]]> By: antijap http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/06/china_continues.html/comment-page-1#comment-5823 antijap Fri, 19 Oct 2007 04:08:07 +0000 http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/06/china_continues.html#comment-5823 <p>Dear Sir,</p> <p>Remember Pearl Harbor !<br /> Buy American !<br /> Boycott Japanese goods and capitals!</p> <p>BIG3 must mean GM, Ford, and Chrysler !</p> <p>Very sincerely yours,</p> Dear Sir,

Remember Pearl Harbor !
Buy American !
Boycott Japanese goods and capitals!

BIG3 must mean GM, Ford, and Chrysler !

Very sincerely yours,

]]> By: Jamie http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/06/china_continues.html/comment-page-1#comment-5822 Jamie Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:29:46 +0000 http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/06/china_continues.html#comment-5822 <p>China is a growing economy and becoming more integrated in the global economy,a solid and productive relationship that is -- where the benefits to that relationship are fairly shared by citizens in both countries is wanted.<br /> Chinese leaders plan eventually to let the yuan trade freely on world markets. But acting too abruptly will hurt China's frail banks and cause financial turmoil.<br /> So I think let the yuan trade freely on world markets would be better.<br /> But the U.S. deficit with China reflects that US need export more to China.Demand for many US products in China are very strong,but there are few, if any, effective methods for US SMF's to access Chinese buyers and meet the demand. AC-Ali enables US businesses to list their company and product descriptions in English. AmeriChinaB2B will translate these descriptions in Chinese and put them on its China Business platform www.acb2b.cn. which attracts a large number of Chinese importers and distributors looking for American products to import to China. Welcome to AmeriChinaB2B(http://www.acb2b.com/ ) to begin your business trip of China.</p> China is a growing economy and becoming more integrated in the global economy,a solid and productive relationship that is — where the benefits to that relationship are fairly shared by citizens in both countries is wanted.
Chinese leaders plan eventually to let the yuan trade freely on world markets. But acting too abruptly will hurt China’s frail banks and cause financial turmoil.
So I think let the yuan trade freely on world markets would be better.
But the U.S. deficit with China reflects that US need export more to China.Demand for many US products in China are very strong,but there are few, if any, effective methods for US SMF’s to access Chinese buyers and meet the demand. AC-Ali enables US businesses to list their company and product descriptions in English. AmeriChinaB2B will translate these descriptions in Chinese and put them on its China Business platform http://www.acb2b.cn. which attracts a large number of Chinese importers and distributors looking for American products to import to China. Welcome to AmeriChinaB2B(http://www.acb2b.com/ ) to begin your business trip of China.

]]>