Climate Consensus - NOT!

This is an outstanding post that a reader sent me that offers a number of climate scientists in their own words taking issue with the climate consensus on CO2-driven anthropogenic global warming.  I won't convince you that man-made CO2 is not one cause for warming -- at this point in the science's development, that would be as big a mistake as declaring AGW theory "settled."  However, for those who get beaten about the head with "consensus" every time you ask a skeptical question about AGW, you should enjoy this article.  This is just one of the 13 vignettes on newly minted skeptics the author highlights:

Botanist Dr. David Bellamy, a famed UK environmental campaigner, former lecturer at Durham University and host of a popular UK TV series on wildlife,
recently converted into a skeptic after reviewing the science and now
calls global warming fears "poppycock." According to a May 15, 2005 article
in the UK Sunday Times, Bellamy said "global warming is largely a
natural phenomenon.  The world is wasting stupendous amounts of money
on trying to fix something that can't be fixed." "The climate-change
people have no proof for their claims. They have computer models which
do not prove anything," Bellamy added. Bellamy's conversion on global
warming did not come without a sacrifice as several environmental
groups have ended their association with him because of his views on
climate change. The severing of relations came despite Bellamy's long
activism for green campaigns. The UK Times reported Bellamy "won
respect from hardline environmentalists with his campaigns to save
Britain's peat bogs and other endangered habitats. In Tasmania he was
arrested when he tried to prevent loggers cutting down a rainforest."

Here is a copy of the petition sent to the Canadian government which several of the people in the article refer to.  One taste:

Observational evidence does not support today's computer climate
models, so there is little reason to trust model predictions of the
future. Yet this is precisely what the United Nations did in creating
and promoting Kyoto and still does in the alarmist forecasts on which
Canada's climate policies are based. Even if the climate models were
realistic, the environmental impact of Canada delaying implementation
of Kyoto or other greenhouse-gas reduction schemes, pending completion
of consultations, would be insignificant. Directing your government to
convene balanced, open hearings as soon as possible would be a most
prudent and responsible course of action....

While the confident pronouncements of scientifically unqualified environmental groups may provide for sensational headlines, they are no basis for mature policyformulation.
The study of global climate change is, as you have said, an "emerging
science," one that is perhaps the most complex ever tackled. It may be
many years yet before we properly understand the Earth's climate
system. Nevertheless, significant advances have been made since the
protocol was created, many of which are taking us away from a concern
about increasing greenhouse gases. If, back in the mid-1990s, we knew
what we know today about climate, Kyoto would almost certainly not
exist, because we would have concluded it was not necessary....

"Climate change is real" is a
meaningless phrase used repeatedly by activists to convince the public
that a climate catastrophe is looming and humanity is the cause.
Neither of these fears is justified. Global climate changes all the
time due to natural causes and the human impact still remains
impossible to distinguish from this natural "noise." The new Canadian
government's commitment to reducing air, land and water pollution is
commendable, but allocating funds to "stopping climate change" would be
irrational. We need to continue intensive research into the real causes
of climate change and help our most vulnerable citizens adapt to
whatever nature throws at us next.

It is signed by scientific no-names like Freeman Dyson and Dr. Richard S. Lindzen, Alfred P. Sloan professor of meteorology, Dept.
of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute
of Technology

  • Mesa EconoGuy

    Freeman Dyson? Of Dyson Sphere fame?

    Holy crap! That was an episode of Star Trek TNG!

  • mike jose

    you are so right, the skeptiks should get together more often, check out Prof. Nils Axel Morner's, of Univ. of Stockholm, Geophysics, opinions on the lack of evidence for rising global seas. Remember when this scare scenario was flavour of the month? Well the satellite telemetry data (which only goes back about 15 years, so check out how much of a baseline these scaremongers have for their stories) shows that global sea levels are not rising significantly, and in fact the error margin allows for a FALL! The fact that Antartica melts a bit then refreezes has to be put in context. Every scare scenario has a probability - we could be struck by an asteroid the size of Texas, but what is the chance of it happening? Am I bothered?

  • Mesa EconoGuy
  • http://www.runescapemil.com runescapemil

    RuneScape RS2 RS 1--10Mil Gold GP fast delivery(30mins)
    Runescapemil is an old runescape gold and items seller since?nearly one year ago. We used to have a lot of runescape items for sale. Now we stop items selling for some reason. But runescape money still available to every hungry runescape players to buy. runescapemil has good reputation in runescape money selling business. And all?runescape money of us?are made?without any bots or duping.
    http://www.runescapemil.com/
    runescape gold
    runescape money
    runescape coin
    runescape GP
    runescape mil
    rs2 gold
    cheap runescape gold
    runescape items for sale
    buy runescape items
    http://www.runescapemil.com/
    http://www.runescapemil.com/Runescape-gold-USD.html
    http://www.runescapemil.com/Runescape-gold-GBP.html