<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And the First to Violate Net Neutrality is &#8230; The Government!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/04/and_the_first_t.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/04/and_the_first_t.html</link>
	<description>Dispatches from a Small Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:39:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/04/and_the_first_t.html/comment-page-1#comment-5430</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/04/and_the_first_t.html#comment-5430</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hmm, I disagree partially. In my town, there is a particularly severe local monopoly on providers and access. Granted, the cable company might not have city-wide control of the market, but I certainly don&#039;t have a 30 minute choice to switch providers. I could start my own: 3 years to never.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I do agree with your worry of any gov&#039;t regulation of Internet, but given the track record of the US government to really provide complete, free-market choices at all levels, national to local, I trust the market participants even less.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It comes down to incentive. Market incentive is not to provide choice, but to limit it. Gov&#039;t incentive is to get bigger. Both are bad, but the former is much more aggressive and fast-moving. I&#039;d like to stall as long as possible. The grass roots campaign is the only solution to either.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, I disagree partially. In my town, there is a particularly severe local monopoly on providers and access. Granted, the cable company might not have city-wide control of the market, but I certainly don&#8217;t have a 30 minute choice to switch providers. I could start my own: 3 years to never.</p>
<p>I do agree with your worry of any gov&#8217;t regulation of Internet, but given the track record of the US government to really provide complete, free-market choices at all levels, national to local, I trust the market participants even less.</p>
<p>It comes down to incentive. Market incentive is not to provide choice, but to limit it. Gov&#8217;t incentive is to get bigger. Both are bad, but the former is much more aggressive and fast-moving. I&#8217;d like to stall as long as possible. The grass roots campaign is the only solution to either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markm</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/04/and_the_first_t.html/comment-page-1#comment-5429</link>
		<dc:creator>markm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/04/and_the_first_t.html#comment-5429</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Government naval yards, for decades, eschewed basic worker protections from asbestos that were common in private industry.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And they are immune from law suits, so instead of the government compensating sick workers, the asbestos mfgs went bankrupt paying damages for providing asbestos to government spec.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Government naval yards, for decades, eschewed basic worker protections from asbestos that were common in private industry.&#8221;</p>
<p>And they are immune from law suits, so instead of the government compensating sick workers, the asbestos mfgs went bankrupt paying damages for providing asbestos to government spec.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neo Wayland</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/04/and_the_first_t.html/comment-page-1#comment-5428</link>
		<dc:creator>Neo Wayland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/04/and_the_first_t.html#comment-5428</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Something similar happened when Culver City, CA offered free internet.  In that case, it was blocking &quot;problematic content&quot; including those sites that criticized municipal internet and other sites that offiered P2P services.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something similar happened when Culver City, CA offered free internet.  In that case, it was blocking &#8220;problematic content&#8221; including those sites that criticized municipal internet and other sites that offiered P2P services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steep</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/04/and_the_first_t.html/comment-page-1#comment-5427</link>
		<dc:creator>steep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/04/and_the_first_t.html#comment-5427</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Under &quot;Corruption?&quot; I think you intended the 500 companies in the S&amp;P500 rather than the 30 in the DJIA.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under &#8220;Corruption?&#8221; I think you intended the 500 companies in the S&#038;P500 rather than the 30 in the DJIA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

