<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mohammad Cartoons, Redux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/02/mohammad_cartoo.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/02/mohammad_cartoo.html</link>
	<description>Dispatches from a Small Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:39:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/02/mohammad_cartoo.html/comment-page-1#comment-4795</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 15:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/02/mohammad_cartoo.html#comment-4795</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Youtube has a history of this from before the Google purchase.  While they remove anti-jihad videos from their site, pro-jihad videos can be found throughout.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Youtube has a history of this from before the Google purchase.  While they remove anti-jihad videos from their site, pro-jihad videos can be found throughout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markm</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/02/mohammad_cartoo.html/comment-page-1#comment-4794</link>
		<dc:creator>markm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/02/mohammad_cartoo.html#comment-4794</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s been suggested that after several warnings, Google/Youtube banned him over copyright infringement (the background music, which I think is the theme from The Matrix), not the contents. They could be liable for damages if they keep hosting things they&#039;ve been told are infringing. However, his piece on the Bible (very similar to the Koran piece) was still up on Sunday, and it&#039;s also got copyrighted background music.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been suggested that after several warnings, Google/Youtube banned him over copyright infringement (the background music, which I think is the theme from The Matrix), not the contents. They could be liable for damages if they keep hosting things they&#8217;ve been told are infringing. However, his piece on the Bible (very similar to the Koran piece) was still up on Sunday, and it&#8217;s also got copyrighted background music.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Warbiany</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/02/mohammad_cartoo.html/comment-page-1#comment-4793</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Warbiany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/02/mohammad_cartoo.html#comment-4793</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t know if you&#039;ve followed any of the spat over John Edwards&#039; new campaign bloggers...  But they said some really nasty things before getting their job, and bloggers like me decided to highlight some of their direct quotes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Apparently-- according to their defenders, anyway-- quoting someone directly becomes a &quot;smear job&quot;.  Even when you provide complete links to context/etc to show that it&#039;s not just pulling their statements out of a hat.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if you&#8217;ve followed any of the spat over John Edwards&#8217; new campaign bloggers&#8230;  But they said some really nasty things before getting their job, and bloggers like me decided to highlight some of their direct quotes.</p>
<p>Apparently&#8211; according to their defenders, anyway&#8211; quoting someone directly becomes a &#8220;smear job&#8221;.  Even when you provide complete links to context/etc to show that it&#8217;s not just pulling their statements out of a hat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

