Licensing Death Spiral
Frequent readers will remember that licensing is one of my big pet peaves, so it will not surpise anyone that I enjoyed TJIC's article on the licensing "cycle of suck"
Here's the cycle of suck:
- a guild of professionals decides to drive up their wages by limiting the supply through accreditation
- to put teeth in the accreditation, they complain to the politicians
- politicians see a chance to scratch a back (and get theirs
scratched in turn) and pass regulations limiting the practice of the
profession by the non-accredited- the price rises and the supply drops
- marginal consumers can't afford the price
- politicians see a chance to scratch a back (and get theirs
scratched in turn) and use taxpayer dollars to increase the supply of a
service"¦but just to a target consumer group
Hair braiding or delivering cows, its all the same phenomena. As usual, I can't make a post on licensing without a quote from Milton Friedman:
The justification offered is always the same: to protect the consumer. However, the reason
is demonstrated by observing who lobbies at the state legislature for
the imposition or strengthening of licensure. The lobbyists are
invariably representatives of the occupation in question rather than of
the customers. True enough, plumbers presumably know better than anyone
else what their customers need to be protected against. However, it is
hard to regard altruistic concern for their customers as the primary
motive behind their determined efforts to get legal power to decide who
may be a plumber.