<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Holier than Thou</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/02/holier_than_tho.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/02/holier_than_tho.html</link>
	<description>Dispatches from a Small Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:39:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/02/holier_than_tho.html/comment-page-1#comment-4776</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 00:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/02/holier_than_tho.html#comment-4776</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article1363818.ece&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The point of the article is to describe an experiment which shows the sun&#039;s effect on climate. Why is this tossed out so easily, given the experimental results to back the hypothesis (I&#039;m not aware of the tests to prove man&#039;s impact, what are they?).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;1. How can we trust linear models which do not properly predict known data? Am I supposed to believe it will accurately predict the future climate? &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;2. And why are scientists still using linear models for describing global climate when newer techniques are available for modeling complex adaptive systems?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article1363818.ece" rel="nofollow">http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article1363818.ece</a></p>
<p>The point of the article is to describe an experiment which shows the sun&#8217;s effect on climate. Why is this tossed out so easily, given the experimental results to back the hypothesis (I&#8217;m not aware of the tests to prove man&#8217;s impact, what are they?).</p>
<p>1. How can we trust linear models which do not properly predict known data? Am I supposed to believe it will accurately predict the future climate? </p>
<p>2. And why are scientists still using linear models for describing global climate when newer techniques are available for modeling complex adaptive systems?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveJ</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/02/holier_than_tho.html/comment-page-1#comment-4775</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 19:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/02/holier_than_tho.html#comment-4775</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You should know by now that all left-wing, activist money comes freely donated by people who CARE, so it is obviously pure, sweet and unbiased.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Whereas anyone who disagrees is obviously corrupt, ignorant, or both. Also, since &#039;profit&#039; is so completely out of line with proper social(ist) responsibility, no corporation, except left-wing non-profits, can ever be anything but evil.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s been obvious to me for years that the radical left is a religious movement. Of course heresy is a crime.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Trivial point: anthropogenic (caused by man), not anthropomorphic (turned into man).&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should know by now that all left-wing, activist money comes freely donated by people who CARE, so it is obviously pure, sweet and unbiased.</p>
<p>Whereas anyone who disagrees is obviously corrupt, ignorant, or both. Also, since &#8216;profit&#8217; is so completely out of line with proper social(ist) responsibility, no corporation, except left-wing non-profits, can ever be anything but evil.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been obvious to me for years that the radical left is a religious movement. Of course heresy is a crime.</p>
<p>Trivial point: anthropogenic (caused by man), not anthropomorphic (turned into man).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vinthewrench</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/02/holier_than_tho.html/comment-page-1#comment-4774</link>
		<dc:creator>vinthewrench</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 00:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/02/holier_than_tho.html#comment-4774</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;this cartoon is relevant &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.daybydaycartoon.com/012807.jpg&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this cartoon is relevant </p>
<p><a href="http://www.daybydaycartoon.com/012807.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.daybydaycartoon.com/012807.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

