<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Global Warming Detente?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/01/global_warming_-4.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/01/global_warming_-4.html</link>
	<description>Dispatches from a Small Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:04:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: some guy</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/01/global_warming_-4.html/comment-page-1#comment-4531</link>
		<dc:creator>some guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/01/global_warming_-4.html#comment-4531</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Weather Channel Climate Expert Calls for Decertifying Global Warming Skeptics&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;he Weather Channelâ€™s most prominent climatologist is advocating that broadcast meteorologists be stripped of their scientific certification if they express skepticism about predictions of manmade catastrophic global warming. This latest call to silence skeptics follows a year (2006) in which skeptics were compared to &quot;Holocaust Deniers&quot; and Nuremberg-style war crimes trials were advocated by several climate alarmists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Weather Channelâ€™s (TWC) Heidi Cullen, who hosts the weekly global warming program &quot;The Climate Code,&quot; is advocating that the American Meteorological Society (AMS) revoke their &quot;Seal of Approval&quot; for any television weatherman who expresses skepticism that human activity is creating a climate catastrophe.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressRoom.Blogs&amp;ContentRecord_id=32abc0b0-802a-23ad-440a-88824bb8e528&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;now isnt that just like the religion of liberalism&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
Weather Channel Climate Expert Calls for Decertifying Global Warming Skeptics</p>
<p>he Weather Channelâ€™s most prominent climatologist is advocating that broadcast meteorologists be stripped of their scientific certification if they express skepticism about predictions of manmade catastrophic global warming. This latest call to silence skeptics follows a year (2006) in which skeptics were compared to &#8220;Holocaust Deniers&#8221; and Nuremberg-style war crimes trials were advocated by several climate alarmists.</p>
<p>The Weather Channelâ€™s (TWC) Heidi Cullen, who hosts the weekly global warming program &#8220;The Climate Code,&#8221; is advocating that the American Meteorological Society (AMS) revoke their &#8220;Seal of Approval&#8221; for any television weatherman who expresses skepticism that human activity is creating a climate catastrophe.</p>
<p>
<a href="http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressRoom.Blogs&#038;ContentRecord_id=32abc0b0-802a-23ad-440a-88824bb8e528" rel="nofollow">http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressRoom.Blogs&#038;ContentRecord_id=32abc0b0-802a-23ad-440a-88824bb8e528</a></p>
<p>now isnt that just like the religion of liberalism</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/01/global_warming_-4.html/comment-page-1#comment-4530</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 04:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2007/01/global_warming_-4.html#comment-4530</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The science is still bogus of course, but at least if people start perceiving the &quot;problem&quot; as something that can be managed rather than as the imminent end of the world, they might become more receptive to looking at solid research and real facts.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The science is still bogus of course, but at least if people start perceiving the &#8220;problem&#8221; as something that can be managed rather than as the imminent end of the world, they might become more receptive to looking at solid research and real facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

