<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Business vs. Government Time Horizons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2006/12/business_vs_gov.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2006/12/business_vs_gov.html</link>
	<description>Dispatches from a Small Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mesa EconoGuy</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2006/12/business_vs_gov.html/comment-page-1#comment-4405</link>
		<dc:creator>Mesa EconoGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 22:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2006/12/business_vs_gov.html #comment-4405</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Coyote writes:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;“Can you imagine someone like Disney doing this?  [Not planning long-term, and acting economically irrationally] Of course not.”&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Disney actually did do this.  My wife, who used to work at Disney World, reflects on the shameful Eisner-era, which is recently over.  The parks fell into a noticeable disrepair on Eisner’s watch (who assumed CEO after Frank Wells’ untimely death) while he pursued purchase and expansion of such non-core businesses as Capital Cities/ABC Broadcasting (including ESPN).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Meanwhile, Disney’s core competencies, such as the parks and movie animation, went largely neglected.  Pixar, Steve Jobs’ digital animation outfit, just recently agreed to a merger, which should have occurred earlier, with Disney.  It was delayed because of Eisner.  When he left, it happened.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But that’s another critical distinction between public and private enterprise – private (or publicly shareowned) enterprises have the ability, and indeed, obligation to “right the ship” when it starts listing.  Government and public entities have no such ability, and continue to expand into areas they were never designed to function, and do so very poorly at increased taxpayer expense.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coyote writes:</p>
<p>“Can you imagine someone like Disney doing this?  [Not planning long-term, and acting economically irrationally] Of course not.”</p>
<p>Disney actually did do this.  My wife, who used to work at Disney World, reflects on the shameful Eisner-era, which is recently over.  The parks fell into a noticeable disrepair on Eisner’s watch (who assumed CEO after Frank Wells’ untimely death) while he pursued purchase and expansion of such non-core businesses as Capital Cities/ABC Broadcasting (including ESPN).</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Disney’s core competencies, such as the parks and movie animation, went largely neglected.  Pixar, Steve Jobs’ digital animation outfit, just recently agreed to a merger, which should have occurred earlier, with Disney.  It was delayed because of Eisner.  When he left, it happened.</p>
<p>But that’s another critical distinction between public and private enterprise – private (or publicly shareowned) enterprises have the ability, and indeed, obligation to “right the ship” when it starts listing.  Government and public entities have no such ability, and continue to expand into areas they were never designed to function, and do so very poorly at increased taxpayer expense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: N. Joseph Potts</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2006/12/business_vs_gov.html/comment-page-1#comment-4404</link>
		<dc:creator>N. Joseph Potts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 15:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2006/12/business_vs_gov.html #comment-4404</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Anon: 20 years: private (or, more specifically, the money of people who WISH to invest in it, not money taken forcibly from people who would like to do something else with their money). 30 years: private. Rovers to Mars? Do you WANT that? Invest in it! So will I, if I want that more than other things I might invest in, or consume, or just contribute to.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Regarding the article, my favorite aphorism is, &quot;No one ever cut a ribbon over a fixed pothole.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon: 20 years: private (or, more specifically, the money of people who WISH to invest in it, not money taken forcibly from people who would like to do something else with their money). 30 years: private. Rovers to Mars? Do you WANT that? Invest in it! So will I, if I want that more than other things I might invest in, or consume, or just contribute to.</p>
<p>Regarding the article, my favorite aphorism is, &#8220;No one ever cut a ribbon over a fixed pothole.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2006/12/business_vs_gov.html/comment-page-1#comment-4403</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 21:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2006/12/business_vs_gov.html #comment-4403</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;How about research? I think a reasonable case can be made that research with a time span pay-off of 10 years should be privately funded. What about 20 years, or 30 years?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What about things like sending rovers to Mars? I can imagine a number of reasonable positions.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about research? I think a reasonable case can be made that research with a time span pay-off of 10 years should be privately funded. What about 20 years, or 30 years?</p>
<p>What about things like sending rovers to Mars? I can imagine a number of reasonable positions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ironman</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2006/12/business_vs_gov.html/comment-page-1#comment-4402</link>
		<dc:creator>Ironman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2006/12/business_vs_gov.html #comment-4402</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Iran&#039;s not alone - Venezuela seems intent on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16038507/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;following the same path&lt;/a&gt; with its oil production.  How much would anyone care to bet that the decline will be blamed on &quot;falling oil reserves&quot; and &quot;peak oil&quot; rather than the respective governments&#039; actions that have squandered their ability to tap the resource?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iran&#8217;s not alone &#8211; Venezuela seems intent on <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16038507/" rel="nofollow">following the same path</a> with its oil production.  How much would anyone care to bet that the decline will be blamed on &#8220;falling oil reserves&#8221; and &#8220;peak oil&#8221; rather than the respective governments&#8217; actions that have squandered their ability to tap the resource?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
