Comments on: Dave Barry was Right about Having Sex with Dogs http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2006/10/dave_barry_was_.html Dispatches from a Small Business Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:39:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: JoshK http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2006/10/dave_barry_was_.html/comment-page-1#comment-3887 JoshK Tue, 24 Oct 2006 14:11:06 +0000 http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2006/10/dave_barry_was_.html#comment-3887 <p>Great post.</p> Great post.

]]> By: dearieme http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2006/10/dave_barry_was_.html/comment-page-1#comment-3886 dearieme Mon, 23 Oct 2006 21:55:10 +0000 http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2006/10/dave_barry_was_.html#comment-3886 <p>In a fine little museum in a county town in Scotland, under the heading "local government" was a sketch of the Town Square in the 16th or 17th century. There were two mounds. "What are those?" I enquired. "They're for executions for buggery". "Why two?" "One for the man and one for the pony."</p> In a fine little museum in a county town in Scotland, under the heading “local government” was a sketch of the Town Square in the 16th or 17th century. There were two mounds. “What are those?” I enquired. “They’re for executions for buggery”. “Why two?” “One for the man and one for the pony.”

]]> By: Big E http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2006/10/dave_barry_was_.html/comment-page-1#comment-3885 Big E Mon, 23 Oct 2006 20:12:27 +0000 http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2006/10/dave_barry_was_.html#comment-3885 <p>Well said. I wonder what Mr. Gleason has to say to those among us who believe that involvement in organized religion is a violation of human dignity. Those people are out there and what makes Sean Gleason a more appropriate arbiter of "human dignity" than George Soros or whoever? </p> <p>I boil Sean's argument down to "I can use the power of the state to coerce you to alter your behavior even if the only way it affects me, or anyone else, is that it offends my sensibilities." I wonder if he could really argue against that being the case.</p> Well said. I wonder what Mr. Gleason has to say to those among us who believe that involvement in organized religion is a violation of human dignity. Those people are out there and what makes Sean Gleason a more appropriate arbiter of “human dignity” than George Soros or whoever?

I boil Sean’s argument down to “I can use the power of the state to coerce you to alter your behavior even if the only way it affects me, or anyone else, is that it offends my sensibilities.” I wonder if he could really argue against that being the case.

]]>