<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reconciling the Skilling Verdicts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2006/05/reconciling_the.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2006/05/reconciling_the.html</link>
	<description>Dispatches from a Small Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:39:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ideoblog</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2006/05/reconciling_the.html/comment-page-1#comment-2641</link>
		<dc:creator>Ideoblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 00:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2006/05/reconciling_the.html#comment-2641</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Motive? we don&#039;t need no stinkin motive&lt;/strong&gt;

On the heels of the Enron verdict, I wondered why the jury would have convicted Skilling on fraud but not insider trading â€“ how could they think Skilling had enough knowledge for one, but not the other. Others wondered about

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motive? we don&#8217;t need no stinkin motive</strong></p>
<p>On the heels of the Enron verdict, I wondered why the jury would have convicted Skilling on fraud but not insider trading â€“ how could they think Skilling had enough knowledge for one, but not the other. Others wondered about</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

