<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Great Example of Zero-Sum Thinking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2006/04/great_example_o.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2006/04/great_example_o.html</link>
	<description>Dispatches from a Small Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:39:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: steevo</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2006/04/great_example_o.html/comment-page-1#comment-2517</link>
		<dc:creator>steevo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 03:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2006/04/great_example_o.html#comment-2517</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree w/ you up to a point.  Afterwhich your argument fails.  Why? because the idea that technology will save the day when there are 100 billion humans inhabiting is dubious indeed.  Just because humans haven&#039;t found the saturation point yet, doesn&#039;t imply that zero-sum doesn&#039;t exist.  Yes, technology has enabled more food w/ less resources .. fine, a great local inflection point.  We will still move towards saturation in the long run.&lt;br /&gt;
The part that I agree with is that when one human consumes x+1, it doesn&#039;t necessarily demand that another human gets x-1 .. that is, until the race hits saturation, which is a loooong way off.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree w/ you up to a point.  Afterwhich your argument fails.  Why? because the idea that technology will save the day when there are 100 billion humans inhabiting is dubious indeed.  Just because humans haven&#8217;t found the saturation point yet, doesn&#8217;t imply that zero-sum doesn&#8217;t exist.  Yes, technology has enabled more food w/ less resources .. fine, a great local inflection point.  We will still move towards saturation in the long run.<br />
The part that I agree with is that when one human consumes x+1, it doesn&#8217;t necessarily demand that another human gets x-1 .. that is, until the race hits saturation, which is a loooong way off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

