<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lawsuit Perpetual Motion Machine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2006/03/lawsuit_perpetu.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2006/03/lawsuit_perpetu.html</link>
	<description>Dispatches from a Small Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:34:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Orlowski Zygmunt</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2006/03/lawsuit_perpetu.html/comment-page-1#comment-2451</link>
		<dc:creator>Orlowski Zygmunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2006/03/lawsuit_perpetu.html #comment-2451</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Perpetual motion machines* (the latin term perpetuum mobile is not uncommon) are a class of hypothetical machines which would produce useful energy &quot;from nowhere.&quot; The existence of a perpetual motion machine is generally accepted as being impossible according to current known laws of physics. In particular, perpetual motion machines would violate either the first or second laws of thermodynamics. Perpetual motion machines are divided into two &lt;br /&gt;
subcategories, referred to as perpetual motion of the first kind and perpetual motion of the second kind. There is a chance that the accepted laws of physics are wrong, but a lot of evidence is needed to regeneralize these.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Physicists may try to test their knowledge of physics by proving, without using thermodynamics, that a proposed perpetual motion machine cannot work. Also, sometimes physicists will discover &quot;apparent&quot; perpetual motion in thought experiments. Such &quot;paradoxes&quot; expose .&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perpetual motion machines* (the latin term perpetuum mobile is not uncommon) are a class of hypothetical machines which would produce useful energy &#8220;from nowhere.&#8221; The existence of a perpetual motion machine is generally accepted as being impossible according to current known laws of physics. In particular, perpetual motion machines would violate either the first or second laws of thermodynamics. Perpetual motion machines are divided into two <br />
subcategories, referred to as perpetual motion of the first kind and perpetual motion of the second kind. There is a chance that the accepted laws of physics are wrong, but a lot of evidence is needed to regeneralize these.</p>
<p>Physicists may try to test their knowledge of physics by proving, without using thermodynamics, that a proposed perpetual motion machine cannot work. Also, sometimes physicists will discover &#8220;apparent&#8221; perpetual motion in thought experiments. Such &#8220;paradoxes&#8221; expose .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orlowski Zygmunt</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2006/03/lawsuit_perpetu.html/comment-page-1#comment-2450</link>
		<dc:creator>Orlowski Zygmunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 10:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2006/03/lawsuit_perpetu.html #comment-2450</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;  My idea is very difficult  for  understanding.  It is not difficult for  engineer - mechanic, who knows  very good  the Pascal&#039;s law and     even-arm  lever.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clean energy&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;         The entire world is looking for a source of clean energy. I have discovered a certain paradox basing on which a machine called METOZ can be built which by harnessing the gravitation of our EARTH can produce clean energy. &lt;br /&gt;
The energy producing process is demonstrated in:&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/paradox.html&lt;br /&gt;
and can be very easily confirmed by an experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
I am also in possession of a set of calculations which prove that the METOZ machine:  &lt;br /&gt;
1/ does not consume water / 39 A5-pictures /;&lt;br /&gt;
2/ does not consume compressed air / 39 A5-pictures /;&lt;br /&gt;
3/ produces energy to the outside =    4 839  kGm  during a „swing cycle” /39 A5-pictures /;&lt;br /&gt;
/  this is a „weight cycle” = the centre of gravity of the water in the METOZ machine sinks ( downward movement ) /&lt;br /&gt;
4/  energy is produced / released to the outside = 44 600  kGm   during the „straightening cycle”  / 39 A5-pictures /.&lt;br /&gt;
/  this is a “pressure cycle” = the water mass centre of gravity inside the METOZ machine travels upwards (upward movement) /&lt;br /&gt;
Features:  1/;  2/;  3/;  4/,    of the machine owing to appropriate dimensions of individual elements of the lever mechanism. &lt;br /&gt;
The METOZ has an even-arm lever of a 1.72 m length. The centre of gravity of the lever lies beneath the lever suspension point. The METOZ is equipped with two cylinders of a 1.6 m diameter each. Piston sidewalls do not contact directly with cylinder walls. The lever swing changes between      and    .&lt;br /&gt;
Figures (  3 x 13 x 4  =  156 )  present temporary, consecutive action situations at  intervals of   .  The middle figure presents the machine and the side figures the position of the left and right cylinder and the mathematical description of these situations.&lt;br /&gt;
In the past I have made two models, which confirmed the legitimacy of my theoretical assumptions concerning the METOZ machine. I have got photographs. &lt;br /&gt;
I am looking for a person who would be interested in my invention.  I can offer ample information. I look forward to hearing from you.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;                            http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/three_levers.html             &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;13 - 03 -2005  Gdynia, Polska                                                                   Zygmunt Orłowski&lt;br /&gt;
P.S.    The term “gravitational paradox” use  in this description relates to the mathematical and physical description of the action of the METOZ-machine.&lt;br /&gt;
THE EARTH GRAVITATION CAN BE THE SOURCE OF CLEAN ENERGY. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Comment for METOZ&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;By&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Orlowski Zygmunt&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Poland 2005&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;index html&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Comments concerning machine &quot;METOZ&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;METOZ&quot; is able to realize the cycle &quot;deflection&quot; and the cycle &quot;straighening.&quot; Both cycles are in accordance with current physic&#039;s laws. &quot;METOZ&quot; as machine can not work and hand over the energy because it would be inconsonant to the law of conservation of energy.&lt;br /&gt;
I propose to execute the following intelectual process:&lt;br /&gt;
we have found ourselves in the Europe of XVII century. We know the trigonometry in the scope of being occured for &quot;METOZ.&quot; We know what is the even-arm lever and moment of force too. Just appeears Mr. Baise Pascal / 1623--1662/ and he publishes his hydraulics law with adequated experiment. All thinkers are sure that this law is correct and quite real. This time someone invents machine &quot;METOZ&quot;. Now turn up the following questions:&lt;br /&gt;
1/ why the implementation of the cycle &quot;deflection&quot; is impossible?&lt;br /&gt;
2/ why the implementation of the cycle &quot;straightening&quot; is impossible?Both groups: opponents and followers of bulding &quot;METOZ&quot; live in XVII--th century and they not know that:&lt;br /&gt;
a/ the idea of an &quot;energy&quot; will be introduced into science scarlerly in mid. of XIX century,&lt;br /&gt;
b/ the law of conservation of the energy will be exist scarlerly after 1847 y.&lt;br /&gt;
QVESTION!!!&lt;br /&gt;
WHAT KIND OF RATIONALY ENTERELY / ARGUMENT/ CAN BE DREAMED UP THE OPPONENTS OF BUILDING THE MACHINE &quot;METOZ&#039; IN XVII CENTURY.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;
Please open  GOOgle  and   klick   metozor  and after : index of metozor      At is  site that explains technical details in easy to understand language.   example : http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/for_greenpeace.html  or&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/energy_for_everybody.html&lt;br /&gt;
Everyone is able to build just the  model of METOZ machine  and    test  it.  Please,  have a look  at     http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/supplement.html        Perhaps  METOZ   is    some    duplicating  machine  of  a  clean  energy.I am inventor and owner of Metoz machine invention. Everyone can  take   absolutely   and   legitimate   the  METOZ  invention and build  the  Metoz machine.  I can help only. I can not build  METOZ.    I   am  moneyless.&lt;br /&gt;
Are you sure  we have energy problem? NO. We have political problem !!!&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>  My idea is very difficult  for  understanding.  It is not difficult for  engineer &#8211; mechanic, who knows  very good  the Pascal&#8217;s law and     even-arm  lever.</p>
<p>Clean energy</p>
<p>         The entire world is looking for a source of clean energy. I have discovered a certain paradox basing on which a machine called METOZ can be built which by harnessing the gravitation of our EARTH can produce clean energy. <br />
The energy producing process is demonstrated in:<br />
<a href="http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/paradox.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/paradox.html</a><br />
and can be very easily confirmed by an experiment.<br />
I am also in possession of a set of calculations which prove that the METOZ machine:  <br />
1/ does not consume water / 39 A5-pictures /;<br />
2/ does not consume compressed air / 39 A5-pictures /;<br />
3/ produces energy to the outside =    4 839  kGm  during a „swing cycle” /39 A5-pictures /;<br />
/  this is a „weight cycle” = the centre of gravity of the water in the METOZ machine sinks ( downward movement ) /<br />
4/  energy is produced / released to the outside = 44 600  kGm   during the „straightening cycle”  / 39 A5-pictures /.<br />
/  this is a “pressure cycle” = the water mass centre of gravity inside the METOZ machine travels upwards (upward movement) /<br />
Features:  1/;  2/;  3/;  4/,    of the machine owing to appropriate dimensions of individual elements of the lever mechanism. <br />
The METOZ has an even-arm lever of a 1.72 m length. The centre of gravity of the lever lies beneath the lever suspension point. The METOZ is equipped with two cylinders of a 1.6 m diameter each. Piston sidewalls do not contact directly with cylinder walls. The lever swing changes between      and    .<br />
Figures (  3 x 13 x 4  =  156 )  present temporary, consecutive action situations at  intervals of   .  The middle figure presents the machine and the side figures the position of the left and right cylinder and the mathematical description of these situations.<br />
In the past I have made two models, which confirmed the legitimacy of my theoretical assumptions concerning the METOZ machine. I have got photographs. <br />
I am looking for a person who would be interested in my invention.  I can offer ample information. I look forward to hearing from you.</p>
<p>                            <a href="http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/three_levers.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/three_levers.html</a>             </p>
<p>13 &#8211; 03 -2005  Gdynia, Polska                                                                   Zygmunt Orłowski<br />
P.S.    The term “gravitational paradox” use  in this description relates to the mathematical and physical description of the action of the METOZ-machine.<br />
THE EARTH GRAVITATION CAN BE THE SOURCE OF CLEAN ENERGY. </p>
<p>Comment for METOZ</p>
<p>
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>By</p>
<p>Orlowski Zygmunt</p>
<p>Poland 2005</p>
<p>index html</p>
<p>Comments concerning machine &#8220;METOZ&#8221;<br />
&#8220;METOZ&#8221; is able to realize the cycle &#8220;deflection&#8221; and the cycle &#8220;straighening.&#8221; Both cycles are in accordance with current physic&#8217;s laws. &#8220;METOZ&#8221; as machine can not work and hand over the energy because it would be inconsonant to the law of conservation of energy.<br />
I propose to execute the following intelectual process:<br />
we have found ourselves in the Europe of XVII century. We know the trigonometry in the scope of being occured for &#8220;METOZ.&#8221; We know what is the even-arm lever and moment of force too. Just appeears Mr. Baise Pascal / 1623&#8211;1662/ and he publishes his hydraulics law with adequated experiment. All thinkers are sure that this law is correct and quite real. This time someone invents machine &#8220;METOZ&#8221;. Now turn up the following questions:<br />
1/ why the implementation of the cycle &#8220;deflection&#8221; is impossible?<br />
2/ why the implementation of the cycle &#8220;straightening&#8221; is impossible?Both groups: opponents and followers of bulding &#8220;METOZ&#8221; live in XVII&#8211;th century and they not know that:<br />
a/ the idea of an &#8220;energy&#8221; will be introduced into science scarlerly in mid. of XIX century,<br />
b/ the law of conservation of the energy will be exist scarlerly after 1847 y.<br />
QVESTION!!!<br />
WHAT KIND OF RATIONALY ENTERELY / ARGUMENT/ CAN BE DREAMED UP THE OPPONENTS OF BUILDING THE MACHINE &#8220;METOZ&#8217; IN XVII CENTURY.</p>
<p>
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Please open  GOOgle  and   klick   metozor  and after : index of metozor      At is  site that explains technical details in easy to understand language.   example : <a href="http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/for_greenpeace.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/for_greenpeace.html</a>  or<br />
<a href="http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/energy_for_everybody.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/energy_for_everybody.html</a><br />
Everyone is able to build just the  model of METOZ machine  and    test  it.  Please,  have a look  at     <a href="http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/supplement.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/supplement.html</a>        Perhaps  METOZ   is    some    duplicating  machine  of  a  clean  energy.I am inventor and owner of Metoz machine invention. Everyone can  take   absolutely   and   legitimate   the  METOZ  invention and build  the  Metoz machine.  I can help only. I can not build  METOZ.    I   am  moneyless.<br />
Are you sure  we have energy problem? NO. We have political problem !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Stitch in Haste</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2006/03/lawsuit_perpetu.html/comment-page-1#comment-2452</link>
		<dc:creator>A Stitch in Haste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 02:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2006/03/lawsuit_perpetu.html #comment-2452</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Working Class Twit of the Year&lt;/strong&gt;

A real-life Oliver St. John-Mollusc:When a dump truck backed into Curtis Gokey&#039;s car, he decided to sue the city for damages. Only thing is, he was the one driving the dump truck. ...

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Working Class Twit of the Year</strong></p>
<p>A real-life Oliver St. John-Mollusc:When a dump truck backed into Curtis Gokey&#8217;s car, he decided to sue the city for damages. Only thing is, he was the one driving the dump truck. &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
