<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You Gotta Love the Government</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2005/11/you_gotta_love_.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2005/11/you_gotta_love_.html</link>
	<description>Dispatches from a Small Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:39:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2005/11/you_gotta_love_.html/comment-page-1#comment-2063</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 02:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2005/11/you_gotta_love_.html#comment-2063</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I gotta love it too.  Just received this same status report from Texas, got to question 17, and said, &quot;what the heck?!&quot;  So, what&#039;s the solution to that?  Google for it, of course.  And, I immediately hit upon your blog.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But, still no answer to my question.  :(   So, I went to Texas law.  And, here&#039;s what I&#039;ve found, under Section 201 of the Texas Labor Code: &quot;In this subtitle, &#039;employer&#039; means an employing unit that: 1) paid wages of $1,500 or more during a calendar quarter in the current or preceding calendar year: or 2) employed at least one individual in employment for a portion of at least one day during 20 or more different calendar weeks of the current or preceding calendar year.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Whew.  That&#039;s still a bit to chew on, but I think it is worded more clearly than question 17 on that form.    So, what I read into this is that, if you recently became an employer and haven&#039;t employed anyone for 20 weeks yet, then there is no date to enter.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gotta love it too.  Just received this same status report from Texas, got to question 17, and said, &#8220;what the heck?!&#8221;  So, what&#8217;s the solution to that?  Google for it, of course.  And, I immediately hit upon your blog.</p>
<p>But, still no answer to my question.  <img src='http://www.coyoteblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />    So, I went to Texas law.  And, here&#8217;s what I&#8217;ve found, under Section 201 of the Texas Labor Code: &#8220;In this subtitle, &#8216;employer&#8217; means an employing unit that: 1) paid wages of $1,500 or more during a calendar quarter in the current or preceding calendar year: or 2) employed at least one individual in employment for a portion of at least one day during 20 or more different calendar weeks of the current or preceding calendar year.&#8221;</p>
<p>Whew.  That&#8217;s still a bit to chew on, but I think it is worded more clearly than question 17 on that form.    So, what I read into this is that, if you recently became an employer and haven&#8217;t employed anyone for 20 weeks yet, then there is no date to enter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Lybbert</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2005/11/you_gotta_love_.html/comment-page-1#comment-2062</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Lybbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2005/11/you_gotta_love_.html#comment-2062</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, that&#039;s terrible.  You&#039;re clearly not the first company to hire a Texan in the last 5 months of the year.  You&#039;d think that would be in some kind of FAQ.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not a lawyer, so my opinion doesn&#039;t count for much, but given that the state is most likely going to subtract 20 weeks from the date you give, I&#039;d assume you should write the correct year (the &quot;calendar year&quot; qualification doens&#039;t seem very useful).&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that&#8217;s terrible.  You&#8217;re clearly not the first company to hire a Texan in the last 5 months of the year.  You&#8217;d think that would be in some kind of FAQ.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a lawyer, so my opinion doesn&#8217;t count for much, but given that the state is most likely going to subtract 20 weeks from the date you give, I&#8217;d assume you should write the correct year (the &#8220;calendar year&#8221; qualification doens&#8217;t seem very useful).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

