Comments on: They Were For Free Speech Before They Were Against It

By: earl

earl — Fri, 11 Nov 2005 01:08:07 +0000

I don’t see anything in there that outlaws yelling fire in a theatre either. Ask a stupid question…

By: Matt

Matt — Tue, 08 Nov 2005 09:25:40 +0000

Moveon.org could comply with the FEC regs, if they found they needed to. They're huge, as online presences go, have tons of money coming in, and the folks who donate to them have few viable alternatives, so the supply is never going to completely dry up until and unless the supply of moonbat loons dries up first.

It's the little guy running a personal blog that's at risk here. And when Democrats say they're for the little guy, what they mean is that they're for bullying people around and saying it's in the little guy's name.

By: Max Lybbert

Max Lybbert — Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:14:00 +0000

I truly was suprised that this came down to party lines. Given the Democratic Party's reliance on Moveon.org, I can't see why they would like to continue to hobble online speech.

Unless, of course, some Democrats think Moveon is a bad thing.