<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Danger of Government-Owned Commercial Enterprises</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2005/08/the_danger_of_g.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2005/08/the_danger_of_g.html</link>
	<description>Dispatches from a Small Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:39:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Murray</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2005/08/the_danger_of_g.html/comment-page-1#comment-2973</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 17:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2005/08/the_danger_of_g.html#comment-2973</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is a discussion my son and I have had often over the years, and I may have won him just last week with the statement &quot;Activities that best serve the public as a monopoly should be performed by government, the rest by the marketplace.&quot;  When pressed, about the only such activity I can identify is...government.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One proper role for government is to discourage the formation of cartels like Debeers (which is not technically a monopoly, honestpartisan, but a syndicate), but too often it is government that creates them and true monopolies.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When I moved to Seminole county twenty years ago, five different garbage collectors served my street and I could choose the fee and pickup schedule that suited me.  Then the county came up with a better way, offering franchises for neighborhood monopolies.  Now, if you want to collect refuse here, startup costs may or may not be any different, but government itself has become the biggest barrier to access in this market.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Is the public served any better?  We still pay about the same, but no one notices because the county now collects it from your mortgage company, and we no longer control rates or schedules.  As for the original argument, that the competitve situation was inefficient and unprofitable, it&#039;s hard for me to believe I would have had so many choices in an unprofitable market.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also, honestpartisan, many roads and airports have been constructed privately, and it&#039;s common for a business or residence owner to be able to choose from among multiple providers for utilities like phone service and electricity.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a discussion my son and I have had often over the years, and I may have won him just last week with the statement &#8220;Activities that best serve the public as a monopoly should be performed by government, the rest by the marketplace.&#8221;  When pressed, about the only such activity I can identify is&#8230;government.</p>
<p>One proper role for government is to discourage the formation of cartels like Debeers (which is not technically a monopoly, honestpartisan, but a syndicate), but too often it is government that creates them and true monopolies.</p>
<p>When I moved to Seminole county twenty years ago, five different garbage collectors served my street and I could choose the fee and pickup schedule that suited me.  Then the county came up with a better way, offering franchises for neighborhood monopolies.  Now, if you want to collect refuse here, startup costs may or may not be any different, but government itself has become the biggest barrier to access in this market.  </p>
<p>Is the public served any better?  We still pay about the same, but no one notices because the county now collects it from your mortgage company, and we no longer control rates or schedules.  As for the original argument, that the competitve situation was inefficient and unprofitable, it&#8217;s hard for me to believe I would have had so many choices in an unprofitable market.</p>
<p>Also, honestpartisan, many roads and airports have been constructed privately, and it&#8217;s common for a business or residence owner to be able to choose from among multiple providers for utilities like phone service and electricity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: honestpartisan</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2005/08/the_danger_of_g.html/comment-page-1#comment-2972</link>
		<dc:creator>honestpartisan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 01:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2005/08/the_danger_of_g.html#comment-2972</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You overlook lots of barriers to market competition in the absence of government regulation.  Monopolies always fail?  Debeers, anyone?  There should be a free market in airports, roads, and utilities?  How would such competition be meaningful given resource limitations and high start-up costs? &lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You overlook lots of barriers to market competition in the absence of government regulation.  Monopolies always fail?  Debeers, anyone?  There should be a free market in airports, roads, and utilities?  How would such competition be meaningful given resource limitations and high start-up costs? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashish Hanwadikar</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2005/08/the_danger_of_g.html/comment-page-1#comment-2971</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashish Hanwadikar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 01:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2005/08/the_danger_of_g.html#comment-2971</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;I am always flabbergasted by folks who support government ownership of commercial assets...&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Giving government ownership of commercial assets is same as giving private interests control over government. Yet the same folks will oppose tooth and nail any attempt to do that.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I am always flabbergasted by folks who support government ownership of commercial assets&#8230;&#8221;<br />
Giving government ownership of commercial assets is same as giving private interests control over government. Yet the same folks will oppose tooth and nail any attempt to do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

