Today, as linked by Hit and Run, the Washingtonian lists a number of blogs that are popular with journalists. I have no particular problem with the list -- I read many of the same blogs myself. However, this description of the libertarian blog at Reasons's Hit and Run struck me as odd (emphasis added):
The libertarians behind Reason magazine strike back with
moderate commentary on a variety of topics ranging from public
television to Gwen Stefani's "Hollaback Girl."
I am not sure that many Republicans or Democrats would consider Reason to be moderate. Its hard to believe that any of us anarcho-capitalist make-government-and-taxes-go-away libertarians would ever be confused with moderates. Reason has in the last month taken stands against the drug war, against any government intervention into property rights, against the Patriot act, in defense of steroid use, and favoring legalization of prostitution and continued legality of pornography. Not many red-staters or blue-staters would call that moderate. It may be consistent, in that it is against statism and for the primacy of individual decision-making, but libertarianism tends to be extreme and uncompromising in these views. And, while most libertarians are not moderate, most moderates are not libertarians -- those who generally call themselves moderate tend to do so because they pick and choose bits of statism from both political parties.
But there is an explanation for the word "moderate", and it goes back to the crappy civics lessons we all have gotten. As I wrote before, those civics lessons were the statist's wet-dream, portraying the range of political thought on a linear scale from socialism on the left to fascism on the right. In other words, our political choices are defined as running from statist control to... statist control. In this framework, anyone who is not a commie or a Nazi are put somewhere in the middle, which has been shorthanded "moderates".
This is obviously a stupid framework, and breaks down when libertarians come into the picture. More modern self-assessment frameworks use grids of at least two dimensions, with at least one dimension being the degree (from none to total) that one accepts state authority over the individual.
Update: Oops, I missed the fact that some of the Reason writers themselves had much the same reaction.