<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All Your Base Are Belong To Us</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2005/02/eminent_domain_.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2005/02/eminent_domain_.html</link>
	<description>Dispatches from a Small Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:39:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eddyp88</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2005/02/eminent_domain_.html/comment-page-1#comment-733</link>
		<dc:creator>eddyp88</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 21:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2005/02/eminent_domain_.html#comment-733</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Eminent Domain has far surpassed its original intent. No longer is private property just seized for road construction and public utilities. Local governments have lately been condemning private citizens from their property just for tax purposes and political or economic gain. Legal cases are springing up all over the nation in which local governments are taking property away from one private party and giving it to another private or corporate party. In one recent case , a township in Ohio is trying to remove one of its residents through the use of eminent domain. The city wants to level houses in the area to make way for new condominiums, which will bring in more taxes. One retired couple is putting up a legal fight against the township and the matter will go before the courts.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Lately however, the justice system has been in favor of eminent domain and its use to take property from one citizen, and give it to another. Most home owners would look at these acts as injustices against private property and individual rights protected by the constitution. Is there such a thing as private property in the US or does the government really own everything like in a communist society? Do you own your property or does the government? These are two questions that point straight at the heart of the eminent domain abuse issue. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;check out the eminent domain abuse t-shirts at&lt;br /&gt;
www.thinkertees.com &lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eminent Domain has far surpassed its original intent. No longer is private property just seized for road construction and public utilities. Local governments have lately been condemning private citizens from their property just for tax purposes and political or economic gain. Legal cases are springing up all over the nation in which local governments are taking property away from one private party and giving it to another private or corporate party. In one recent case , a township in Ohio is trying to remove one of its residents through the use of eminent domain. The city wants to level houses in the area to make way for new condominiums, which will bring in more taxes. One retired couple is putting up a legal fight against the township and the matter will go before the courts.</p>
<p>Lately however, the justice system has been in favor of eminent domain and its use to take property from one citizen, and give it to another. Most home owners would look at these acts as injustices against private property and individual rights protected by the constitution. Is there such a thing as private property in the US or does the government really own everything like in a communist society? Do you own your property or does the government? These are two questions that point straight at the heart of the eminent domain abuse issue. </p>
<p>check out the eminent domain abuse t-shirts at<br />
<a href="http://www.thinkertees.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.thinkertees.com</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dreaded_scarum</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2005/02/eminent_domain_.html/comment-page-1#comment-732</link>
		<dc:creator>dreaded_scarum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 13:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2005/02/eminent_domain_.html#comment-732</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Beware of the redevelopment authorities , and their hue and cry about blighted properties.  The end run around the blatant taking of a persons property for economic development to expand the tax base ,is redevelopment aurhorities and redevelopment plans.  The sneaky property  thieves will actually attempt to pass legislation that up front looks like they are attempting to protect your property , meanwhile leaving a one or two sentence loophole addressing blighted property.  While up front we dont want a building that is so neglected that it cant be used by anyone other than the crack heads and homless ; eminent domain in the form of a redevelopment plan is not an acceptable answer.  ALL Cities and local governments have Codes that address that situation. The Codes might need some streamling or tweaking, but they ALREADY have the tools to address blighted properties. Dont be fooled into potentially giving quasi governmental agency&#039;s the power to take your property if you dont want to sell.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beware of the redevelopment authorities , and their hue and cry about blighted properties.  The end run around the blatant taking of a persons property for economic development to expand the tax base ,is redevelopment aurhorities and redevelopment plans.  The sneaky property  thieves will actually attempt to pass legislation that up front looks like they are attempting to protect your property , meanwhile leaving a one or two sentence loophole addressing blighted property.  While up front we dont want a building that is so neglected that it cant be used by anyone other than the crack heads and homless ; eminent domain in the form of a redevelopment plan is not an acceptable answer.  ALL Cities and local governments have Codes that address that situation. The Codes might need some streamling or tweaking, but they ALREADY have the tools to address blighted properties. Dont be fooled into potentially giving quasi governmental agency&#8217;s the power to take your property if you dont want to sell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2005/02/eminent_domain_.html/comment-page-1#comment-731</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2005 21:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2005/02/eminent_domain_.html#comment-731</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Shame on the Supreme Court, of course, but the real culprits here are the individual legislators in Connecticut that passed this law in the first place. The Supreme Court simply confirmed that the Connecticut law is constitutional, but without the Connecticut legislators, we wouldn&#039;t have this problem in the first place.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve placed a call to arms on my blog describing my plan to hold these legislators individually accountable. How can we call ourselves patriotic Americans if we fail to end the career of every single Connecticut legislator who supported this law by having them voted out of office? At the very least we can show the children of these legislators, via the ensuing publicity, that they should be ashamed of their parents. While our troops are overseas fighting for freedom, these legislators sit in their air conditioned offices passing laws that take those freedoms away! They should be held accountable, and they should be banned from public office via a civically-minded electorate.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The first step is finding the names of the legislators who supported this law (especially the prominent ones, but also the not so prominent ones), and Iâ€™m hoping our good friends from Connecticut will be able to do this (seeing as this happened in their own backyard).&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shame on the Supreme Court, of course, but the real culprits here are the individual legislators in Connecticut that passed this law in the first place. The Supreme Court simply confirmed that the Connecticut law is constitutional, but without the Connecticut legislators, we wouldn&#8217;t have this problem in the first place.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve placed a call to arms on my blog describing my plan to hold these legislators individually accountable. How can we call ourselves patriotic Americans if we fail to end the career of every single Connecticut legislator who supported this law by having them voted out of office? At the very least we can show the children of these legislators, via the ensuing publicity, that they should be ashamed of their parents. While our troops are overseas fighting for freedom, these legislators sit in their air conditioned offices passing laws that take those freedoms away! They should be held accountable, and they should be banned from public office via a civically-minded electorate.</p>
<p>The first step is finding the names of the legislators who supported this law (especially the prominent ones, but also the not so prominent ones), and Iâ€™m hoping our good friends from Connecticut will be able to do this (seeing as this happened in their own backyard).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2005/02/eminent_domain_.html/comment-page-1#comment-730</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 16:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2005/02/eminent_domain_.html#comment-730</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve begun a wiki of companies that use eminent domain to acquire property -- www.landthieves.wikispaces.org&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Boycott the companies, or contact them demanding an explanation.  Take action.  We&#039;ve let these land thieves have a free ride for too long.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve begun a wiki of companies that use eminent domain to acquire property &#8212; <a href="http://www.landthieves.wikispaces.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.landthieves.wikispaces.org</a></p>
<p>Boycott the companies, or contact them demanding an explanation.  Take action.  We&#8217;ve let these land thieves have a free ride for too long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2005/02/eminent_domain_.html/comment-page-1#comment-729</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2005 18:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2005/02/eminent_domain_.html#comment-729</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The only way to fix these wrongs is to excert our force of the ballot box I have recently sent this to all my area elected officals &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Dear .&lt; elected offical &gt;  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I am writing your office to express my enormous displeasure and   disappointment in the recent supreme court rulings . The seizure of private property for one . The second is the right of sick people to use what ever drug a doctor deems appropriate for their treatment . Thirdly the whittling away of our protection of freedoms by articles of the patriot act .&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If I buy my own home take pride in it only to have it taken from me and given to a corporation for a for profit endeavor  then we are slipping into a gray area between democracy and totalitarianism. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Our personal rights are being eroded a little at a time. I never thought I would see the day when my home could be taken away from me and given to a corporation to make a  profit and  to make  higher tax revenue for a city or government and profit for a corporation . Granted this is a boom for governments any development  can result in seizure of property for making a bigger tax base and higher profits .  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is a boom for the ones who have the greatest leverage with the cities and governments ,corporations and  land developers. Those who have the least influence with governmental agencies  will suffer the most common home owners. Here is a conflict of interest Governmental agencies  can  seize property  sell to a corporation  which builds a hotel  the taxes created from the hotel would be greater than 20 single family homes . What better reason to seize property more money . Good bye to the great American Dream . &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The eminent domain  clause was for PUBLIC usage  what public usage is a corporate holdings  a hotel  jobs and more taxes . Ask what public use is most believe  roads , railways, parks, libraries and other public buildings . Governments have a vested interest  to allow this at the expense of the rest of us . &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The medical use of marijuana is a pharmacological issue not a legal issue  The withholding medical treatment  is considered cruel and unusual punishment  These issues should be decided by the medical field and physicians rather than lawyers. Lawyers know the law . Doctors know physiology .&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The use of â€œto control interstate commerceâ€ as a reason to uphold the law barring the medical use of marijuana  for sick people. This is a medical issue not a commerce issue . I feel that reasoning allows open-ended application of that reason This use can be expanded to other areas  and I am sure will be expanded to any thing that could affect interstate commerce . Home gardens raising your own food affects interstate commerce ie  I donâ€™t buy food  which  is affecting interstate commerce and subject to the controls of the federal government . &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The indefinite open-ended detention of US citizens or adversaries without charges  breaks our fundamental rules  of justice.  The searches  with  out notification is  secret searches . We as a people  left those actions behind over 200 years ago . Only to be brought back now . William Blackstone said it&#039;s better for 10 guilty people to go free than for one innocent person to suffer . &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt; Our Nation was built on personal freedoms  being foremost. Great leaders of ours created a wonderful constitution and bill of rights . Which is systematically being picked apart piece at a time . Many of the reasons the early America broke away from the crown of England  are being undermined  over time . The checks and balances  between the people ,the government,  the judicial branch and the executive branch are gradually being wiped away .  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Our nation is  becoming  what we left 200 years ago we are returning to the same  tyrannical  rule . The blood and lives of many  were given  to form a new government  now  200 years later that government is returning to the same governmental actions  they fought to leave . &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We the people of America  have voted  in politicians  to serve our best interests of the majorities and protect  the interests of the minorities .&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt; And this is happening . &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We need statesman to undo what  has become of our freedoms and to protect us  from future erosions of the Great Dream  our forefathers  envisioned of our country . I wonder how many would be turning over in their graves  if they  saw  what has became of their Great Dream . &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I and many other Citizens of  the US implore you and others in the Legislative bodies and Governorships to  fulfill your duties as elected officials to  safe guard our liberties now and  in our future . Think of what is best for all  of us not a select few . &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sincerely  a US citizen paying taxes and voting &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;politician   &lt;br /&gt;
noun &lt;br /&gt;
a member of a government or law-making organization: &lt;br /&gt;
statesman  &lt;br /&gt;
noun &lt;br /&gt;
an experienced politician, especially one who is respected for making good judgments&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only way to fix these wrongs is to excert our force of the ballot box I have recently sent this to all my area elected officals </p>
<p>Dear .< elected offical >  </p>
<p>I am writing your office to express my enormous displeasure and   disappointment in the recent supreme court rulings . The seizure of private property for one . The second is the right of sick people to use what ever drug a doctor deems appropriate for their treatment . Thirdly the whittling away of our protection of freedoms by articles of the patriot act .</p>
<p>If I buy my own home take pride in it only to have it taken from me and given to a corporation for a for profit endeavor  then we are slipping into a gray area between democracy and totalitarianism. </p>
<p>Our personal rights are being eroded a little at a time. I never thought I would see the day when my home could be taken away from me and given to a corporation to make a  profit and  to make  higher tax revenue for a city or government and profit for a corporation . Granted this is a boom for governments any development  can result in seizure of property for making a bigger tax base and higher profits .  </p>
<p>This is a boom for the ones who have the greatest leverage with the cities and governments ,corporations and  land developers. Those who have the least influence with governmental agencies  will suffer the most common home owners. Here is a conflict of interest Governmental agencies  can  seize property  sell to a corporation  which builds a hotel  the taxes created from the hotel would be greater than 20 single family homes . What better reason to seize property more money . Good bye to the great American Dream . </p>
<p>The eminent domain  clause was for PUBLIC usage  what public usage is a corporate holdings  a hotel  jobs and more taxes . Ask what public use is most believe  roads , railways, parks, libraries and other public buildings . Governments have a vested interest  to allow this at the expense of the rest of us . </p>
<p>The medical use of marijuana is a pharmacological issue not a legal issue  The withholding medical treatment  is considered cruel and unusual punishment  These issues should be decided by the medical field and physicians rather than lawyers. Lawyers know the law . Doctors know physiology .</p>
<p>The use of â€œto control interstate commerceâ€ as a reason to uphold the law barring the medical use of marijuana  for sick people. This is a medical issue not a commerce issue . I feel that reasoning allows open-ended application of that reason This use can be expanded to other areas  and I am sure will be expanded to any thing that could affect interstate commerce . Home gardens raising your own food affects interstate commerce ie  I donâ€™t buy food  which  is affecting interstate commerce and subject to the controls of the federal government . </p>
<p>The indefinite open-ended detention of US citizens or adversaries without charges  breaks our fundamental rules  of justice.  The searches  with  out notification is  secret searches . We as a people  left those actions behind over 200 years ago . Only to be brought back now . William Blackstone said it&#8217;s better for 10 guilty people to go free than for one innocent person to suffer . </p>
<p> Our Nation was built on personal freedoms  being foremost. Great leaders of ours created a wonderful constitution and bill of rights . Which is systematically being picked apart piece at a time . Many of the reasons the early America broke away from the crown of England  are being undermined  over time . The checks and balances  between the people ,the government,  the judicial branch and the executive branch are gradually being wiped away .  </p>
<p>Our nation is  becoming  what we left 200 years ago we are returning to the same  tyrannical  rule . The blood and lives of many  were given  to form a new government  now  200 years later that government is returning to the same governmental actions  they fought to leave . </p>
<p>We the people of America  have voted  in politicians  to serve our best interests of the majorities and protect  the interests of the minorities .</p>
<p> And this is happening . </p>
<p>We need statesman to undo what  has become of our freedoms and to protect us  from future erosions of the Great Dream  our forefathers  envisioned of our country . I wonder how many would be turning over in their graves  if they  saw  what has became of their Great Dream . </p>
<p>I and many other Citizens of  the US implore you and others in the Legislative bodies and Governorships to  fulfill your duties as elected officials to  safe guard our liberties now and  in our future . Think of what is best for all  of us not a select few . </p>
<p>Sincerely  a US citizen paying taxes and voting 
</p>
<p>politician   <br />
noun <br />
a member of a government or law-making organization: <br />
statesman  <br />
noun <br />
an experienced politician, especially one who is respected for making good judgments</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2005/02/eminent_domain_.html/comment-page-1#comment-728</link>
		<dc:creator>dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2005 04:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2005/02/eminent_domain_.html#comment-728</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;this is scary when govt can take your property so&lt;br /&gt;
developers can profit.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is scary when govt can take your property so<br />
developers can profit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Outraged+</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2005/02/eminent_domain_.html/comment-page-1#comment-727</link>
		<dc:creator>Outraged+</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 19:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2005/02/eminent_domain_.html#comment-727</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I hope New Londoners will rally to face down the march of &quot;national socialism&quot; in their hometown.  Maybe a Krupp munitions factory, with its own labor camp adjoined, built on the intellectually and morally blighted neighborhoods of the city council-persons would be a bigger economic and emblematic boon than the Pfizer development.  This decision is so grossly unlawful as to merit action against the Supreme socialists. &lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope New Londoners will rally to face down the march of &#8220;national socialism&#8221; in their hometown.  Maybe a Krupp munitions factory, with its own labor camp adjoined, built on the intellectually and morally blighted neighborhoods of the city council-persons would be a bigger economic and emblematic boon than the Pfizer development.  This decision is so grossly unlawful as to merit action against the Supreme socialists. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Outraged</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2005/02/eminent_domain_.html/comment-page-1#comment-726</link>
		<dc:creator>Outraged</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 17:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2005/02/eminent_domain_.html#comment-726</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The Supreme Court&#039;s decision to allow local governments to seize personal property in order to commercially develop is outrageous. Someone needs to organize a boycott against the businesses that develop that land, both on a local and on a national level (in the case of a national hotel chain). An organized threat of a boycott may make them think twice about continuing with this plan.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court&#8217;s decision to allow local governments to seize personal property in order to commercially develop is outrageous. Someone needs to organize a boycott against the businesses that develop that land, both on a local and on a national level (in the case of a national hotel chain). An organized threat of a boycott may make them think twice about continuing with this plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gongol.com</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2005/02/eminent_domain_.html/comment-page-1#comment-739</link>
		<dc:creator>Gongol.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 18:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2005/02/eminent_domain_.html#comment-739</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;February 28th Carnival of the Capitalists&lt;/strong&gt;

Some personal favorites: Problems with eminent domain, thoughts on self-publishing a book, and a most peculiar solution to end-of-life medical care.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>February 28th Carnival of the Capitalists</strong></p>
<p>Some personal favorites: Problems with eminent domain, thoughts on self-publishing a book, and a most peculiar solution to end-of-life medical care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dearieme</title>
		<link>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2005/02/eminent_domain_.html/comment-page-1#comment-725</link>
		<dc:creator>dearieme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coyote-blog.com/wordpress/2005/02/eminent_domain_.html#comment-725</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;May I welcome back &quot;nifty&quot; from wherever it has been hibernating?  Lurvly word.  I even saw &quot;slattern&quot; the other day.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May I welcome back &#8220;nifty&#8221; from wherever it has been hibernating?  Lurvly word.  I even saw &#8220;slattern&#8221; the other day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

